Different selective dry cow therapy concepts compared to blanket antibiotic dry cow treatment

M. T. Seeth, N. Wente, J. Paduch, D. Klocke, E. Vries, M. Hoedemaker, V. Krömker
{"title":"Different selective dry cow therapy concepts compared to blanket antibiotic dry cow treatment","authors":"M. T. Seeth, N. Wente, J. Paduch, D. Klocke, E. Vries, M. Hoedemaker, V. Krömker","doi":"10.15653/TPG-170208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the use of somatic cell count (SCC) and aerobic bacterial counts as possible tools to choose animals for selective dry cow treatment (DCT) on cow level. Blanket antibiotic DCT is an approved and common method in Germany aimed at increasing the cure rate of existing intramammary infections (IMI) at the time of drying off and decreasing the risk of new infections during the dry period. However, not all animals benefit equally from an antibiotic DCT. Moreover, dairies, consumers and politicians demand a reduction in the use of antibiotics in farm animals. Several criteria for identifying animals which would benefit from antibiotic DCT have been described in the literature. Material and methods: Animals chosen for this investigation were divided into three study groups: Aerobic Count Petrifilm® group A (153 cows), SCC group S (160 cows) and control group C (169 cows). All quarters were treated with an internal teat sealant (ITS) no matter which group the cows belonged to. Results: Group C, in which all cows received an antibiotic DCT, achieved the best results referred to udder health, particularly regarding bacteriological dry period cure. However, the results of the two study groups A and S, in which the animals were dried off selectively, were only marginally worse. A significant difference regarding bacterial dry period cure was revealed between group S and group C (p = 0.039), whereas no significant difference concerning new IMI risk could be detected between the three study groups. Compared to a blanket antibiotic DCT of all cows in the corresponding study group, a reduction of the usage of antibiotics of 23.5 % (A) and 55 % (S) was noticed, respectively. Furthermore, it could be shown that the lactation number as well as the microorganisms present at the time of drying off influence udder health. Conclusion: Selective DCT is an alternative method to the widespread blanket antibiotic DCT. However, it has to be mentioned that selective DCT involves the described marginal decline in udder health and the additional amount of time, which might arise from the procedure of choosing the right animals and performing the applied rapid test methods.","PeriodicalId":326229,"journal":{"name":"Tierärztliche Praxis G: Großtiere/Nutztiere","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tierärztliche Praxis G: Großtiere/Nutztiere","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15653/TPG-170208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Summary Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the use of somatic cell count (SCC) and aerobic bacterial counts as possible tools to choose animals for selective dry cow treatment (DCT) on cow level. Blanket antibiotic DCT is an approved and common method in Germany aimed at increasing the cure rate of existing intramammary infections (IMI) at the time of drying off and decreasing the risk of new infections during the dry period. However, not all animals benefit equally from an antibiotic DCT. Moreover, dairies, consumers and politicians demand a reduction in the use of antibiotics in farm animals. Several criteria for identifying animals which would benefit from antibiotic DCT have been described in the literature. Material and methods: Animals chosen for this investigation were divided into three study groups: Aerobic Count Petrifilm® group A (153 cows), SCC group S (160 cows) and control group C (169 cows). All quarters were treated with an internal teat sealant (ITS) no matter which group the cows belonged to. Results: Group C, in which all cows received an antibiotic DCT, achieved the best results referred to udder health, particularly regarding bacteriological dry period cure. However, the results of the two study groups A and S, in which the animals were dried off selectively, were only marginally worse. A significant difference regarding bacterial dry period cure was revealed between group S and group C (p = 0.039), whereas no significant difference concerning new IMI risk could be detected between the three study groups. Compared to a blanket antibiotic DCT of all cows in the corresponding study group, a reduction of the usage of antibiotics of 23.5 % (A) and 55 % (S) was noticed, respectively. Furthermore, it could be shown that the lactation number as well as the microorganisms present at the time of drying off influence udder health. Conclusion: Selective DCT is an alternative method to the widespread blanket antibiotic DCT. However, it has to be mentioned that selective DCT involves the described marginal decline in udder health and the additional amount of time, which might arise from the procedure of choosing the right animals and performing the applied rapid test methods.
不同的选择性干牛治疗概念与地毯式抗生素干牛治疗的比较
摘要目的:本研究旨在探讨利用体细胞计数(SCC)和好氧细菌计数作为选择动物进行奶牛水平选择性干牛处理(DCT)的可能工具。毯式抗生素DCT是德国批准的常用方法,旨在提高干燥期现有乳内感染(IMI)的治愈率,并降低干燥期新感染的风险。然而,并不是所有的动物都能从抗生素DCT中受益。此外,奶牛场、消费者和政界人士都要求减少对农场动物使用抗生素。在文献中已经描述了几种鉴定将受益于抗生素DCT的动物的标准。材料和方法:将实验动物分为3个研究组:好氧计数Petrifilm®组(153头)、SCC组(160头)和对照组(169头)。无论奶牛属于哪一组,所有区的奶牛都使用了内乳密封剂(ITS)。结果:在C组中,所有奶牛都接受了抗生素DCT,在乳房健康方面取得了最好的结果,特别是在细菌干燥期治愈方面。然而,在A组和S组中,动物被选择性地晒干,结果只差一点点。S组和C组在细菌干期治愈率方面差异有统计学意义(p = 0.039),而在新发IMI风险方面,3个研究组之间差异无统计学意义。与相应研究组中所有奶牛的毯子抗生素DCT相比,抗生素的使用分别减少了23.5% (a)和55% (S)。此外,可以证明,哺乳数量以及在干燥时存在的微生物影响乳房健康。结论:选择性DCT是广泛应用的地毯式抗生素DCT的替代方法。然而,必须提到的是,选择性DCT涉及所述的乳房健康的边际下降和额外的时间,这可能来自选择正确的动物和执行应用的快速测试方法的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信