KAJIAN YURIDIS: STATUS KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI DALAM SISTEM KETATANEGARAAN INDONESIA

Jurnal Ilmiah Raad Kertha Pub Date : 2022-08-30 DOI:10.47532/jirk.v5i2.687

I. D. A Gde Budiarta, Putu Andhika Kusuma Yadnya, I. N. Suandika

{"title":"KAJIAN YURIDIS: STATUS KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI DALAM SISTEM KETATANEGARAAN INDONESIA","authors":"I. D. A Gde Budiarta, Putu Andhika Kusuma Yadnya, I. N. Suandika","doi":"10.47532/jirk.v5i2.687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study will discuss further about the status of the KPK in the Indonesian constitutional system not only in terms of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, but also from sharing the opinions of legal experts in the field of state administration, in this case as an example of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). will be analyzed is about its status. From this problem the author tries to raise the status of the Corruption Eradication Commission in an Indonesian constitutional system and how the position of the Corruption Eradication Commission in the constitutional system of the Republic of Indonesia. This research was studied using normative research. The status of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) in the Indonesian constitutional system is as a State Institution within the scope of executive power but is independent. The KPK is a supporting institution that is separate or even independent, from the executive department, but is actually \"executive\". Clearly, the KPK is also not in the judiciary, because it is not a judicial body authorized to hear and decide cases. Others, the KPK is also not a legislative body, because it is not a law-forming organ","PeriodicalId":129246,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmiah Raad Kertha","volume":"215 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmiah Raad Kertha","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47532/jirk.v5i2.687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study will discuss further about the status of the KPK in the Indonesian constitutional system not only in terms of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, but also from sharing the opinions of legal experts in the field of state administration, in this case as an example of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). will be analyzed is about its status. From this problem the author tries to raise the status of the Corruption Eradication Commission in an Indonesian constitutional system and how the position of the Corruption Eradication Commission in the constitutional system of the Republic of Indonesia. This research was studied using normative research. The status of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) in the Indonesian constitutional system is as a State Institution within the scope of executive power but is independent. The KPK is a supporting institution that is separate or even independent, from the executive department, but is actually "executive". Clearly, the KPK is also not in the judiciary, because it is not a judicial body authorized to hear and decide cases. Others, the KPK is also not a legislative body, because it is not a law-forming organ

查看原文本刊更多论文

司法审查:印尼公民事务腐败委员会的地位

本研究将进一步讨论肃贪委员会在印度尼西亚宪法制度中的地位，不仅从1945年印度尼西亚共和国宪法的角度出发，而且从分享国家行政领域法律专家的意见出发，在本案例中以肃贪委员会(KPK)为例。接下来分析的是它的现状。从这个问题出发，笔者试图提出反腐委员会在印尼宪法制度中的地位，以及反腐委员会在印尼共和国宪法制度中的地位。本研究采用规范研究方法。铲除腐败委员会(肃贪委员会)在印度尼西亚宪法制度中的地位是行政权力范围内的国家机构，但是独立的。KPK是一个独立于执行部门的支持机构，但实际上是“执行”的。显然，肃贪会也不在司法部门，因为它不是一个被授权审理和裁决案件的司法机构。此外，肃贪会也不是一个立法机构，因为它不是一个制定法律的机构

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Jurnal Ilmiah Raad Kertha

自引率

0.00%

发文量