An Empirical Investigation of Feedback Sequencing on Emotion Regulation Processes

Emily A. Dolan, David P. Keppel, Jessica M. Covert, Brittany L. Fleming
{"title":"An Empirical Investigation of Feedback Sequencing on Emotion Regulation Processes","authors":"Emily A. Dolan, David P. Keppel, Jessica M. Covert, Brittany L. Fleming","doi":"10.22492/issn.2189-1036.2022.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effects of receiving feedback on course assessments have emotional implications for students (e.g., Ryan & Henderson, 2018) that extend to motivation and behavior (Boud & Falchilvov, 2007). Receiving negative feedback, then, may have harmful effects on students’ emotions, motivation, and performance. A way in which students’ emotions may be regulated is through employing the “feedback sandwich” (Dohrenwent, 2002). The method focuses on variability in feedback ordering, and specifically holds that “sandwiching” constructive feedback in between two positive statements is the most effective way to deliver negative feedback to students. While widely discussed in the popular press, there exists little empirical research on the effectiveness of method, and to date, only one study has examined the effects of the feedback sandwich on emotion regulation. This study presents an empirical test of the effects of feedback sequencing on emotion regulation. Results indicate that the sandwich method did not have an effect on either positive or negative emotion. Results are discussed in light of their theoretical and applied implications for feedback sequencing.","PeriodicalId":297862,"journal":{"name":"IICE Official Conference Proceedings","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IICE Official Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22492/issn.2189-1036.2022.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effects of receiving feedback on course assessments have emotional implications for students (e.g., Ryan & Henderson, 2018) that extend to motivation and behavior (Boud & Falchilvov, 2007). Receiving negative feedback, then, may have harmful effects on students’ emotions, motivation, and performance. A way in which students’ emotions may be regulated is through employing the “feedback sandwich” (Dohrenwent, 2002). The method focuses on variability in feedback ordering, and specifically holds that “sandwiching” constructive feedback in between two positive statements is the most effective way to deliver negative feedback to students. While widely discussed in the popular press, there exists little empirical research on the effectiveness of method, and to date, only one study has examined the effects of the feedback sandwich on emotion regulation. This study presents an empirical test of the effects of feedback sequencing on emotion regulation. Results indicate that the sandwich method did not have an effect on either positive or negative emotion. Results are discussed in light of their theoretical and applied implications for feedback sequencing.
情绪调节过程反馈排序的实证研究
在课程评估中接受反馈的影响对学生有情感影响(例如,Ryan & Henderson, 2018),并延伸到动机和行为(Boud & Falchilvov, 2007)。因此,接受负面反馈可能会对学生的情绪、动机和表现产生有害影响。调节学生情绪的一种方法是采用“反馈三明治”(Dohrenwent, 2002)。该方法关注反馈顺序的可变性,并特别认为将建设性反馈“夹”在两个积极陈述之间是向学生传递负面反馈的最有效方式。虽然在大众媒体中广泛讨论,但很少有关于该方法有效性的实证研究,迄今为止,只有一项研究检验了反馈三明治对情绪调节的影响。本研究对反馈排序对情绪调节的影响进行了实证检验。结果表明,三明治法对积极情绪和消极情绪都没有影响。结果讨论了光的理论和应用意义的反馈排序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信