“Ecologism” as an Attempt to Overcome the Ideological Crisis of "Europeanism"

Chankov Georgi Geоrgiev
{"title":"“Ecologism” as an Attempt to Overcome the Ideological Crisis of \"Europeanism\"","authors":"Chankov Georgi Geоrgiev","doi":"10.11648/j.ijes.20210501.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Successful European integration requires its own ideology. This is \"Europeanism\". In this article \"Europeanism\" is examined as an internally contradictory combination of irrational and rational considerations, officially presented as part of the paradigm of the European Enlightenment. After the expulsion of rival ideologies, neoliberalism builds the basis of today's Europeanism, which claims to be scientific, together with the several integration theories. Practice refutes most of these rational constructions after the 2008 crisis, both economically and politically. Integration theories cannot explain why the free market is failing. The crisis in the Eurozone 2011 revitalized economic nationalism and contributed to the erosion of the dominant paradigm. In the political field Europeanism has failed in its attempt to transform the EU's immediate environment in a positive way. The enforcement of multiculturalism, despite acknowledgments that it “has failed”, has split the Union internally. The reaction is a collapse of the belief in neoliberalism and hence the rise of Euroscepticism. In an attempt to organize some kind of \"Counter-Reformation\" in search of the lost loyalty, the European elite is trying to renew and supplement the ideological basis of the integration with one of the directions of (delete ‘the’) left-wing neoliberalism, namely \"ecologism\". It tries to impose - both domestically and internationally, the fight against \"global warming\" as an irrational cause that will give a new impetus to social development and integration in particular, as well as (delete ‘to’) solve specific problems of the energy poor European Union. The ecological ingredient in Europeanism is very suitable psychologically - \"alarmism\" is very well received by some rich and “anxious” societies. Economically it could help the energy poor Union to restrain its competitors on the world market. But the success of this attempt does not seem certain.","PeriodicalId":410077,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of European Studies","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of European Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijes.20210501.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Successful European integration requires its own ideology. This is "Europeanism". In this article "Europeanism" is examined as an internally contradictory combination of irrational and rational considerations, officially presented as part of the paradigm of the European Enlightenment. After the expulsion of rival ideologies, neoliberalism builds the basis of today's Europeanism, which claims to be scientific, together with the several integration theories. Practice refutes most of these rational constructions after the 2008 crisis, both economically and politically. Integration theories cannot explain why the free market is failing. The crisis in the Eurozone 2011 revitalized economic nationalism and contributed to the erosion of the dominant paradigm. In the political field Europeanism has failed in its attempt to transform the EU's immediate environment in a positive way. The enforcement of multiculturalism, despite acknowledgments that it “has failed”, has split the Union internally. The reaction is a collapse of the belief in neoliberalism and hence the rise of Euroscepticism. In an attempt to organize some kind of "Counter-Reformation" in search of the lost loyalty, the European elite is trying to renew and supplement the ideological basis of the integration with one of the directions of (delete ‘the’) left-wing neoliberalism, namely "ecologism". It tries to impose - both domestically and internationally, the fight against "global warming" as an irrational cause that will give a new impetus to social development and integration in particular, as well as (delete ‘to’) solve specific problems of the energy poor European Union. The ecological ingredient in Europeanism is very suitable psychologically - "alarmism" is very well received by some rich and “anxious” societies. Economically it could help the energy poor Union to restrain its competitors on the world market. But the success of this attempt does not seem certain.
“生态主义”作为克服“欧洲主义”思想危机的尝试
成功的欧洲一体化需要自己的意识形态。这就是“欧洲主义”。在本文中,“欧洲主义”被视为非理性和理性考量的内在矛盾组合,正式作为欧洲启蒙范式的一部分提出。在驱逐了竞争意识形态之后,新自由主义与几种整合理论一起构建了今天自称科学的欧洲主义的基础。2008年危机之后的实践从经济上和政治上驳斥了这些理性的构建。一体化理论无法解释自由市场失败的原因。2011年的欧元区危机重振了经济民族主义,并导致主导范式受到侵蚀。在政治领域,欧洲主义未能以积极的方式改变欧盟当前的环境。尽管承认多元文化主义“失败了”,但它的实施在欧盟内部造成了分裂。其反应是对新自由主义信仰的崩溃,从而导致欧洲怀疑主义的兴起。在试图组织某种“反改革”来寻找失去的忠诚的过程中,欧洲精英正试图用左翼新自由主义的一个方向,即“生态主义”来更新和补充一体化的意识形态基础。它试图在国内和国际上强加反对“全球变暖”的斗争,认为这是一种非理性的事业,将为社会发展和一体化提供新的动力,特别是解决能源贫乏的欧盟的具体问题(删除“to”)。欧洲主义的生态成分在心理上是非常合适的——“危言耸听”很受一些富裕而“焦虑”的社会的欢迎。在经济上,它可以帮助能源贫乏的欧盟限制其在世界市场上的竞争对手。但这一尝试的成功似乎并不确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信