The Effect of Verbal Praise on Maze Completion

IF 0.8
Thomas J. Gambino
{"title":"The Effect of Verbal Praise on Maze Completion","authors":"Thomas J. Gambino","doi":"10.24839/2164-8204.JN21.1.54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"COPYRIGHT 2016 BY PSI CHI, THE INTERNATIONAL HONOR SOCIETY IN PSYCHOLOGY (VOL. 21, NO. 1/ISSN 2164-8204) Verbal praise is often used to reinforce desired behaviors. It provides feedback about specific performance and may guide future performance. Praise has been shown to increase athletic performance (Anderson, Crowell, Doman, & Howard, 1988) and effort on subsequent trials of a task following task-relevant praise (Baumeister, Hutton, & Cairns, 1990). Research has suggested that praise influences not only the behavior itself but also attitudes about tasks performed. Although praise is often directed at specific behaviors, it also influences attitudes about specific tasks, motivation, persistence to complete tasks, and attributions of task performance. Early work by Mueller and Dweck (1998) investigated how type of praise influences children’s effort and motivation. They hypothesized that praise directed at ability (intelligence) and praise directed at effort, when administered after success, would lead children to have different goals for their achievement and have different responses when confronted with failure or challenge. Fifth graders completed a series of 10 matrices, each progressively becoming more difficult. Results found that students praised for intelligence were more concerned with performance goals, and the students praised for effort were more concerned with learning goals. Additionally, students praised for effort wanted to continue learning, and students praised for intelligence were concerned with looking smart. When examining explanations for failure, Mueller and Dweck (1998) found that students praised for effort blamed their performance on their effort, and the students praised for intelligence blamed their performance on their ability. They concluded that students praised for effort enjoyed the tasks much more than the students praised for ability. Droe (2013) found similar results in a music setting. Music students received either praise for effort, praise for talent, or no praise following a rhythm-tapping test and then rated their motivation and performance attribution (learning goals or performance goals). Similar to Muller and Dweck (1998), Droe (2013) found that students praised for their effort were more likely to choose learning goals, and students praised for musical talent were more likely to choose performance goals and had a more positive attitude toward task persistence. ABSTRACT. The purpose of the present study was to examine the relationship between verbal praise and performance. Past literature has supported the positive impact that encouragement has on performance. Praise has been found to increase athletic performance (Anderson, Crowell, Doman, & Howard, 1988) as well as academic performance. However, the type of encouragement can lead to different outcomes. Participants in the current study completed a difficult line maze while either being praised in the form of encouraging comments (“You’re doing fine,” “You’re doing great”) or less encouraging comments (“You’re taking too long,” “ Hurry up”). Time to complete the maze was recorded in seconds. Analyses showed that praise in the form of encouraging comments significantly reduced the time to complete the maze (p = .001) and to complete the maze in general (p < .001). Implications of the findings and suggestions for future research are discussed. The Effect of Verbal Praise on Maze Completion","PeriodicalId":407971,"journal":{"name":"Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research","volume":"355 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24839/2164-8204.JN21.1.54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

COPYRIGHT 2016 BY PSI CHI, THE INTERNATIONAL HONOR SOCIETY IN PSYCHOLOGY (VOL. 21, NO. 1/ISSN 2164-8204) Verbal praise is often used to reinforce desired behaviors. It provides feedback about specific performance and may guide future performance. Praise has been shown to increase athletic performance (Anderson, Crowell, Doman, & Howard, 1988) and effort on subsequent trials of a task following task-relevant praise (Baumeister, Hutton, & Cairns, 1990). Research has suggested that praise influences not only the behavior itself but also attitudes about tasks performed. Although praise is often directed at specific behaviors, it also influences attitudes about specific tasks, motivation, persistence to complete tasks, and attributions of task performance. Early work by Mueller and Dweck (1998) investigated how type of praise influences children’s effort and motivation. They hypothesized that praise directed at ability (intelligence) and praise directed at effort, when administered after success, would lead children to have different goals for their achievement and have different responses when confronted with failure or challenge. Fifth graders completed a series of 10 matrices, each progressively becoming more difficult. Results found that students praised for intelligence were more concerned with performance goals, and the students praised for effort were more concerned with learning goals. Additionally, students praised for effort wanted to continue learning, and students praised for intelligence were concerned with looking smart. When examining explanations for failure, Mueller and Dweck (1998) found that students praised for effort blamed their performance on their effort, and the students praised for intelligence blamed their performance on their ability. They concluded that students praised for effort enjoyed the tasks much more than the students praised for ability. Droe (2013) found similar results in a music setting. Music students received either praise for effort, praise for talent, or no praise following a rhythm-tapping test and then rated their motivation and performance attribution (learning goals or performance goals). Similar to Muller and Dweck (1998), Droe (2013) found that students praised for their effort were more likely to choose learning goals, and students praised for musical talent were more likely to choose performance goals and had a more positive attitude toward task persistence. ABSTRACT. The purpose of the present study was to examine the relationship between verbal praise and performance. Past literature has supported the positive impact that encouragement has on performance. Praise has been found to increase athletic performance (Anderson, Crowell, Doman, & Howard, 1988) as well as academic performance. However, the type of encouragement can lead to different outcomes. Participants in the current study completed a difficult line maze while either being praised in the form of encouraging comments (“You’re doing fine,” “You’re doing great”) or less encouraging comments (“You’re taking too long,” “ Hurry up”). Time to complete the maze was recorded in seconds. Analyses showed that praise in the form of encouraging comments significantly reduced the time to complete the maze (p = .001) and to complete the maze in general (p < .001). Implications of the findings and suggestions for future research are discussed. The Effect of Verbal Praise on Maze Completion
言语表扬对迷宫完成的影响
国际心理学荣誉学会(第21卷第21号)2016年版权所有。口头表扬经常被用来强化期望的行为。它提供关于具体表现的反馈,并可能指导未来的表现。表扬已被证明可以提高运动表现(Anderson, Crowell, Doman, & Howard, 1988),并在与任务相关的表扬之后的任务后续试验中提高努力(Baumeister, Hutton, & Cairns, 1990)。研究表明,表扬不仅会影响行为本身,还会影响对所完成任务的态度。虽然表扬通常是针对特定的行为,但它也会影响对特定任务的态度、动机、完成任务的毅力和任务绩效的归因。Mueller和Dweck(1998)的早期工作研究了表扬类型如何影响儿童的努力和动机。他们假设,对能力(智力)的表扬和对努力的表扬,如果在孩子成功后进行,会导致他们对自己的成就有不同的目标,在面对失败或挑战时也会有不同的反应。五年级的学生完成了一系列的10个矩阵,每一个都变得越来越难。结果发现,智力被表扬的学生更关注表现目标,而努力被表扬的学生更关注学习目标。此外,被表扬努力的学生想要继续学习,而被表扬聪明的学生则更注重看起来聪明。在研究失败的解释时,Mueller和Dweck(1998)发现,因努力而受到表扬的学生将他们的表现归咎于他们的努力,而因智力而受到表扬的学生将他们的表现归咎于他们的能力。他们的结论是,被表扬努力的学生比被表扬能力的学生更喜欢任务。Droe(2013)在音乐环境中也发现了类似的结果。在节奏敲击测试后,学音乐的学生分别获得了努力表扬、天赋表扬或没有表扬,然后对他们的动机和表现归因(学习目标或表现目标)进行了评分。与Muller and Dweck(1998)相似,Droe(2013)发现努力被表扬的学生更倾向于选择学习目标,音乐天赋被表扬的学生更倾向于选择表演目标,并且对任务坚持持更积极的态度。摘要本研究的目的是探讨口头表扬与表现之间的关系。过去的文献支持鼓励对绩效的积极影响。表扬被发现可以提高运动成绩(Anderson, Crowell, Doman, & Howard, 1988)和学业成绩。然而,这种类型的鼓励可能导致不同的结果。在目前的研究中,参与者在完成一个困难的线迷宫时,要么得到鼓励的评论(“你做得很好”、“你做得很好”),要么得到不那么鼓励的评论(“你花的时间太长了”、“快点”)。完成迷宫的时间以秒为单位记录。分析表明,以鼓励的评论形式的表扬显著减少了完成迷宫的时间(p = .001)和完成迷宫的时间(p < .001)。讨论了研究结果的意义和对未来研究的建议。言语表扬对迷宫完成的影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书