Clinical analysis of somatic and reproductive anamnesis of pregnant women with sexually transmitted infections in the case history

O. Krotik
{"title":"Clinical analysis of somatic and reproductive anamnesis of pregnant women with sexually transmitted infections in the case history","authors":"O. Krotik","doi":"10.52705/2788-6190-2021-4-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective: to conduct a clinical and statistical analysis of somatic and reproductive anamnesis of pregnant women with sexually transmitted infections in the case history.\nMaterials and methods. Clinical and statistical analysis of somatic and reproductive anamnesis of 100 pregnant women with sexually transmitted infections in the case history, who were randomly divided into two groups: I (main) group – 50 pregnant women who were subject to pregravid training, obstetric and perinatal support and delivery according to the medical and organizational algorithms, prognostic methods and medical-preventive activities developed by us; Group II – 50 pregnant women who received conventional prognostic and medical-preventive activities and Group III (control) – 30 practically healthy pregnant women with a successful reproductive history and uncomplicated course of this pregnancy. Data processing was performed using StatSoft Statistica 8.0 software package.\nResults. The main risk factors of obstetric and perinatal complications for the women under investigation, with sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the case history, are: the presence of a high infectious index in the anamnesis (76.0% and 72.0%), chronic and acute inflammatory processes of the urinary tract system (48.0% and 40.0%), STIs before pregnancy (32.0% and 28.0%), as well as reproductive losses of infectious origin (21.0% and 28.0%): miscarriages, fetal growth retardation and placental dysfunction, ante- and intranatal fetal death in the anamnesis. The conducted clinical and statistical analysis based on the studied indicators did not reveal a significant difference between the women of the main group and the control group, which enables us to compare them in a further study.\nConclusions. When comparing the data obtained after analysis of the premorbid background, somatic and reproductive anamnesis of pregnant women with sexually transmitted infections in the case history, significant differences between the main and the control group were not found, which allows us to compare them in a further study.","PeriodicalId":419861,"journal":{"name":"Perinatology and reproductology: from research to practice","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perinatology and reproductology: from research to practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52705/2788-6190-2021-4-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective: to conduct a clinical and statistical analysis of somatic and reproductive anamnesis of pregnant women with sexually transmitted infections in the case history. Materials and methods. Clinical and statistical analysis of somatic and reproductive anamnesis of 100 pregnant women with sexually transmitted infections in the case history, who were randomly divided into two groups: I (main) group – 50 pregnant women who were subject to pregravid training, obstetric and perinatal support and delivery according to the medical and organizational algorithms, prognostic methods and medical-preventive activities developed by us; Group II – 50 pregnant women who received conventional prognostic and medical-preventive activities and Group III (control) – 30 practically healthy pregnant women with a successful reproductive history and uncomplicated course of this pregnancy. Data processing was performed using StatSoft Statistica 8.0 software package. Results. The main risk factors of obstetric and perinatal complications for the women under investigation, with sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the case history, are: the presence of a high infectious index in the anamnesis (76.0% and 72.0%), chronic and acute inflammatory processes of the urinary tract system (48.0% and 40.0%), STIs before pregnancy (32.0% and 28.0%), as well as reproductive losses of infectious origin (21.0% and 28.0%): miscarriages, fetal growth retardation and placental dysfunction, ante- and intranatal fetal death in the anamnesis. The conducted clinical and statistical analysis based on the studied indicators did not reveal a significant difference between the women of the main group and the control group, which enables us to compare them in a further study. Conclusions. When comparing the data obtained after analysis of the premorbid background, somatic and reproductive anamnesis of pregnant women with sexually transmitted infections in the case history, significant differences between the main and the control group were not found, which allows us to compare them in a further study.
病史中性传播感染孕妇躯体和生殖性遗忘的临床分析
目的:对病例史中性传播感染孕妇的躯体和生殖性遗忘进行临床和统计分析。材料和方法。对病例史上100名性传播感染孕妇的躯体和生殖记忆进行临床和统计分析,随机分为两组:I(主要)组——50名孕妇,根据我们制定的医疗和组织算法、预后方法和医疗预防活动,接受孕前培训、产科和围产期支持和分娩;第二组- 50名接受常规预后和医疗预防活动的孕妇;第三组(对照组)- 30名实际健康的孕妇,具有成功的生育史,本次妊娠过程不复杂。数据处理采用StatSoft Statistica 8.0软件包。调查中有性传播感染史的妇女的产科和围产期并发症的主要危险因素是:在记忆中存在高感染指数(76.0%和72.0%),尿路系统慢性和急性炎症过程(48.0%和40.0%),怀孕前性传播感染(32.0%和28.0%),以及感染源性生殖损失(21.0%和28.0%)。流产,胎儿生长迟缓和胎盘功能障碍,产前和产前胎儿死亡的记忆。根据所研究的指标进行临床和统计分析,未发现主组妇女与对照组妇女之间有明显差异,可以在进一步的研究中进行比较。在对病例史中性传播感染孕妇的病前背景、躯体和生殖记忆进行分析后得到的数据进行比较时,未发现主要组与对照组之间存在显著差异,这使得我们可以在进一步的研究中进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信