A Comparative study between Different Treatment Modalities of Floating Knee injury At Aswan University Hospital

Mohamed Salman, A. Gamal, Ebeed Yassen Ebrahim, H. Refae
{"title":"A Comparative study between Different Treatment Modalities of Floating Knee injury At Aswan University Hospital","authors":"Mohamed Salman, A. Gamal, Ebeed Yassen Ebrahim, H. Refae","doi":"10.47631/jsrmbs.v3i1.345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The study aimed at presenting a comparison between the modalities of treatment different of floating knee injury at Aswan University Hospital.\n Materials and Methods:  This study is a prospective study including all of our 20 cases of floating knee injuries who were treated utilizing various treatment modalities at Aswan University Hospital between December 2018 and September 2019 with a follow-up period of 12 months\n Results: Based on the data analysis,  nailing is a better modality in floating knee injury (especially with diaphyseal long bone). Moreover, plating is a good choice for distal fractures, the external fixator is considered a choice for limb saving(as in popliteal ischemia, open fractures(OG3), and compartment syndrome).\n Conclusion: Management of floating knee injury is critical as floating knee injury is not like other fractures. Floating knee injuries are serious injuries with a high rate of complications. Besides being caused by high-energy trauma with extensive skeletal and soft tissue damage, they are also associated with potentially life-threatening injuries of the head, chest, and abdomen. There are multiple controversies in surgical management starting from choosing suitable fixation for each patient according to variable conditions.  Floating knee injury remains a challenging orthopedic problem in which regaining good knee function outcome is a major concern. Stable osteosynthesis to achieve rigid fixation and early mobilization should always be attempted.","PeriodicalId":422270,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scientific Research in Medical and Biological Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scientific Research in Medical and Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47631/jsrmbs.v3i1.345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: The study aimed at presenting a comparison between the modalities of treatment different of floating knee injury at Aswan University Hospital.  Materials and Methods:  This study is a prospective study including all of our 20 cases of floating knee injuries who were treated utilizing various treatment modalities at Aswan University Hospital between December 2018 and September 2019 with a follow-up period of 12 months  Results: Based on the data analysis,  nailing is a better modality in floating knee injury (especially with diaphyseal long bone). Moreover, plating is a good choice for distal fractures, the external fixator is considered a choice for limb saving(as in popliteal ischemia, open fractures(OG3), and compartment syndrome).  Conclusion: Management of floating knee injury is critical as floating knee injury is not like other fractures. Floating knee injuries are serious injuries with a high rate of complications. Besides being caused by high-energy trauma with extensive skeletal and soft tissue damage, they are also associated with potentially life-threatening injuries of the head, chest, and abdomen. There are multiple controversies in surgical management starting from choosing suitable fixation for each patient according to variable conditions.  Floating knee injury remains a challenging orthopedic problem in which regaining good knee function outcome is a major concern. Stable osteosynthesis to achieve rigid fixation and early mobilization should always be attempted.
阿斯旺大学医院浮动膝关节损伤不同治疗方式的比较研究
目的:本研究旨在比较阿斯旺大学医院不同治疗方式对浮动膝关节损伤的影响。材料与方法:本研究是一项前瞻性研究,包括2018年12月至2019年9月在阿斯旺大学医院采用各种治疗方式治疗的所有20例漂浮性膝关节损伤,随访期为12个月。结果:根据数据分析,钉入是漂浮性膝关节损伤(特别是骨干长骨)的较好治疗方式。此外,钢板是远端骨折的良好选择,外固定架被认为是保存肢体的选择(如腘动脉缺血、开放性骨折(OG3)和筋膜室综合征)。结论:漂浮性膝关节损伤不同于其他骨折,治疗至关重要。浮动膝损伤是一种并发症发生率高的严重损伤。除了由高能创伤引起的广泛的骨骼和软组织损伤外,它们还与头部、胸部和腹部潜在的危及生命的损伤有关。从根据不同情况为每位患者选择合适的固定装置开始,手术治疗存在诸多争议。浮动膝关节损伤仍然是一个具有挑战性的骨科问题,其中恢复良好的膝关节功能结果是主要关注的问题。应始终尝试稳定的植骨以实现刚性固定和早期活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信