Pelvic Tilt and Range of Motion in Hips With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

Rikin V Patel, Shuyang Han, C. Lenherr, Joshua D. Harris, P. Noble
{"title":"Pelvic Tilt and Range of Motion in Hips With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.","authors":"Rikin V Patel, Shuyang Han, C. Lenherr, Joshua D. Harris, P. Noble","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nPhysiotherapy is a management option for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome. This study examines the influence of changes in pelvic tilt and hip adduction on the range of motion (ROM) of the hip.\n\n\nMETHODS\nTen FAI hips were used to simulate impingement at two positions: (1) 20° internal rotation (IR) with 100° flexion and 10° adduction and (2) 40° IR with 35° flexion and 10° adduction; the amount of IR was measured at the point of bony impingement or to the defined limit. Each simulation was performed at neutral and 5° and 10° anterior and posterior pelvic tilt. Then, the hip was placed in 10° of abduction, and all simulations were repeated.\n\n\nRESULTS\nWith neutral pelvic tilt, impingement occurred at 4.3 ± 8.4° of IR at the high-flexion position. An increase in anterior pelvic tilt led to a loss of IR, that is, earlier occurrence of FAI, whereas an increase in posterior pelvic tilt led to an increase in IR, that is, later occurrence of FAI. At the high-flexion position, abduction provided more IR before impingement (neutral: 9.1 ± 5.7°, P < 0.01; 10° anterior tilt: 14.6 ± 5.2°, P < 0.01; 10° posterior tilt: 4.2 ± 3.7° IR, P = 0.01). Placing the hip in abduction and posteriorly tilting the pelvis produce a combined effect that increased IR relative to the neutrally tilted pelvis (5° posterior tilt: 11.4 ± 7.6°, P = 0.01; 10° posterior tilt: 12.8 ± 7.6°, P < 0.01). The ROM in the mid-flexion position was not affected by any combination of pelvic tilt and hip abduction or adduction (average IR: 37.4 ± 5.0°, P > 0.05).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nAbduction and posterior pelvic tilt increased the impingement-free ROM in the hips with FAI. Thus, rehabilitation aimed at altering the tilt of the pelvis may reduce the frequency of impingement and limit further joint damage.","PeriodicalId":110802,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Physiotherapy is a management option for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome. This study examines the influence of changes in pelvic tilt and hip adduction on the range of motion (ROM) of the hip. METHODS Ten FAI hips were used to simulate impingement at two positions: (1) 20° internal rotation (IR) with 100° flexion and 10° adduction and (2) 40° IR with 35° flexion and 10° adduction; the amount of IR was measured at the point of bony impingement or to the defined limit. Each simulation was performed at neutral and 5° and 10° anterior and posterior pelvic tilt. Then, the hip was placed in 10° of abduction, and all simulations were repeated. RESULTS With neutral pelvic tilt, impingement occurred at 4.3 ± 8.4° of IR at the high-flexion position. An increase in anterior pelvic tilt led to a loss of IR, that is, earlier occurrence of FAI, whereas an increase in posterior pelvic tilt led to an increase in IR, that is, later occurrence of FAI. At the high-flexion position, abduction provided more IR before impingement (neutral: 9.1 ± 5.7°, P < 0.01; 10° anterior tilt: 14.6 ± 5.2°, P < 0.01; 10° posterior tilt: 4.2 ± 3.7° IR, P = 0.01). Placing the hip in abduction and posteriorly tilting the pelvis produce a combined effect that increased IR relative to the neutrally tilted pelvis (5° posterior tilt: 11.4 ± 7.6°, P = 0.01; 10° posterior tilt: 12.8 ± 7.6°, P < 0.01). The ROM in the mid-flexion position was not affected by any combination of pelvic tilt and hip abduction or adduction (average IR: 37.4 ± 5.0°, P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Abduction and posterior pelvic tilt increased the impingement-free ROM in the hips with FAI. Thus, rehabilitation aimed at altering the tilt of the pelvis may reduce the frequency of impingement and limit further joint damage.
股骨髋臼撞击综合征髋部骨盆倾斜和活动范围。
物理治疗是治疗股髋臼撞击(FAI)综合征的一种管理选择。本研究探讨骨盆倾斜和髋关节内收变化对髋关节活动范围(ROM)的影响。方法采用10个FAI髋关节在两个位置模拟撞击:(1)20°内旋(IR), 100°屈曲和10°内收;(2)40°IR, 35°屈曲和10°内收;在骨撞击点或规定的极限处测量IR的量。每次模拟均在中性、骨盆前后倾斜5°和10°时进行。然后,将髋关节置于外展10°,重复所有模拟。结果中性骨盆倾斜时,高屈曲位撞击发生在IR 4.3±8.4°。骨盆前倾角的增加导致IR的丧失,即FAI的早期发生,而骨盆后倾角的增加导致IR的增加,即FAI的晚期发生。在高屈曲位,外展在撞击前提供更多的IR(中性:9.1±5.7°,P < 0.01;10°前倾:14.6±5.2°,P < 0.01;10°后倾角:4.2±3.7°IR, P = 0.01)。髋外展和骨盆后倾可使骨盆相对中性倾斜时IR增加(后倾5°:11.4±7.6°,P = 0.01;10°后倾角:12.8±7.6°,P < 0.01)。中屈曲位的ROM不受骨盆倾斜和髋关节外展或内收的任何组合的影响(平均IR: 37.4±5.0°,P > 0.05)。结论骨诱拐和骨盆后倾增加了FAI髋部无撞击ROM。因此,旨在改变骨盆倾斜度的康复治疗可以减少撞击发生的频率,限制进一步的关节损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信