Management Capabilities and Performance of Firms in the Russian Federation

A. G. Goswami, Iván Torre
{"title":"Management Capabilities and Performance of Firms in the Russian Federation","authors":"A. G. Goswami, Iván Torre","doi":"10.1596/1813-9450-8996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using the management and operational practices survey in the Russian Federation, this paper finds that an average Russian manufacturing firm adopts 43 percent of the structured management practices (a score of 0.43), a value that is far from the frontier (for example, the United States scores 0.62). This average mask the wide heterogeneity in practices, where a large share of firms adopt few structured management practices and only 3.5 percent of them have a score over 0.75. Consistent with the findings in other countries, better managed firms in Russia show stronger firm performance, measured as gross revenue per employee, value added per employee, total factor productivity, and employment growth. Improving the management score from the 10th to the 90th percentile is associated with an increase in sales per worker by 87 percent, value added per worker by 30 percent, and total factor productivity by 13.5 percent. What drives better management capabilities? Russian firms are similar to those in other countries, such that exporters and firms with foreign linkages are better managed. Switching from operating purely in the domestic market to being globally linked is associated with a significant increase in management capabilities. However, unlike the results in other countries, management capabilities in Russia are not associated with firm age, implying that firms do not learn to be better managed over their life cycle. This result points to the possibility of inefficient allocation of resources, such that learning and selection mechanism does not weed out the badly managed firms, perhaps due to the lack of pro-competitive forces.","PeriodicalId":444500,"journal":{"name":"World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-8996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Using the management and operational practices survey in the Russian Federation, this paper finds that an average Russian manufacturing firm adopts 43 percent of the structured management practices (a score of 0.43), a value that is far from the frontier (for example, the United States scores 0.62). This average mask the wide heterogeneity in practices, where a large share of firms adopt few structured management practices and only 3.5 percent of them have a score over 0.75. Consistent with the findings in other countries, better managed firms in Russia show stronger firm performance, measured as gross revenue per employee, value added per employee, total factor productivity, and employment growth. Improving the management score from the 10th to the 90th percentile is associated with an increase in sales per worker by 87 percent, value added per worker by 30 percent, and total factor productivity by 13.5 percent. What drives better management capabilities? Russian firms are similar to those in other countries, such that exporters and firms with foreign linkages are better managed. Switching from operating purely in the domestic market to being globally linked is associated with a significant increase in management capabilities. However, unlike the results in other countries, management capabilities in Russia are not associated with firm age, implying that firms do not learn to be better managed over their life cycle. This result points to the possibility of inefficient allocation of resources, such that learning and selection mechanism does not weed out the badly managed firms, perhaps due to the lack of pro-competitive forces.
俄罗斯联邦企业的管理能力和绩效
利用俄罗斯联邦的管理和运营实践调查,本文发现俄罗斯制造企业平均采用了43%的结构化管理实践(得分为0.43),这一数值远未达到前沿(例如,美国得分为0.62)。这个平均值掩盖了实践中的广泛异质性,其中大部分公司采用很少的结构化管理实践,只有3.5%的公司得分超过0.75。与其他国家的调查结果一致,俄罗斯管理较好的企业表现更佳,衡量指标为每位员工的总收入、每位员工的增加值、全要素生产率和就业增长。如果将经营分数从第10百分位提高到第90百分位,人均销售额将增加87%,人均增加值将增加30%,全要素生产率将增加13.5%。是什么推动了更好的管理能力?俄罗斯的公司与其他国家的公司相似,出口商和与国外有联系的公司得到了更好的管理。从纯粹在国内市场经营转向与全球联系,与管理能力的显著提高有关。然而,与其他国家的结果不同,俄罗斯的管理能力与公司年龄无关,这意味着公司在其生命周期中没有学会更好地管理。这一结果指出了资源配置效率低下的可能性,这样的学习和选择机制并没有淘汰管理不善的公司,这可能是由于缺乏促进竞争的力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信