[Evidence of the harmful effects of eosinophils in bronchial asthma].

B Mehić, A Konjicija, H Zutić, Z Lukić
{"title":"[Evidence of the harmful effects of eosinophils in bronchial asthma].","authors":"B Mehić,&nbsp;A Konjicija,&nbsp;H Zutić,&nbsp;Z Lukić","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fifteen asthmatic patients were prospectively selected. If they had more than 450 eosinophils in peripheral blood on admission to hospital treatment and if before BAL had been performed they were not treated by corticosteroids. No associated disease was found which could cause the increased number of eosinophils in peripheral blood except bronchial asthma. BAL was performed when the subjects tested had no dyspnea, usually 1-3 days after the hospital admission. In contrast to blood eosinophilia, increase of eosinophils number in BAL was found to correlate to impairment of clinically measured parameters such as: ventilation level of blood gases and duration of hospitalisation. On the contrary there was no correlation between the level of blood eosinophilia and gas disturbance and duration of hospitalisation. Eosinophilic proteins (MBP, ECP, EPX, EPO) are not the only that harmfully effect the lung cells in the asthmatic attack but the fact that their level in lavage fluid correlates to eosinophilia degree in BAL is evident so the correlation between the number of eosinophils in BAL and impairment of clinically measured parameters is clear.</p>","PeriodicalId":77589,"journal":{"name":"Plucne bolesti : casopis Udruzenja pneumoftiziologa Jugoslavije = the journal of Yugoslav Association of Phthisiology and Pneumology","volume":"42 1-2","pages":"104-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plucne bolesti : casopis Udruzenja pneumoftiziologa Jugoslavije = the journal of Yugoslav Association of Phthisiology and Pneumology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fifteen asthmatic patients were prospectively selected. If they had more than 450 eosinophils in peripheral blood on admission to hospital treatment and if before BAL had been performed they were not treated by corticosteroids. No associated disease was found which could cause the increased number of eosinophils in peripheral blood except bronchial asthma. BAL was performed when the subjects tested had no dyspnea, usually 1-3 days after the hospital admission. In contrast to blood eosinophilia, increase of eosinophils number in BAL was found to correlate to impairment of clinically measured parameters such as: ventilation level of blood gases and duration of hospitalisation. On the contrary there was no correlation between the level of blood eosinophilia and gas disturbance and duration of hospitalisation. Eosinophilic proteins (MBP, ECP, EPX, EPO) are not the only that harmfully effect the lung cells in the asthmatic attack but the fact that their level in lavage fluid correlates to eosinophilia degree in BAL is evident so the correlation between the number of eosinophils in BAL and impairment of clinically measured parameters is clear.

[嗜酸性粒细胞对支气管哮喘有害影响的证据]。
前瞻性选择15例哮喘患者。如果患者入院治疗时外周血中嗜酸性粒细胞超过450个,且在行BAL之前未接受皮质类固醇治疗。除支气管哮喘外,未发现引起外周血嗜酸性粒细胞增多的相关疾病。当受试者没有呼吸困难时,通常在入院后1-3天进行BAL。与嗜酸性粒细胞相比,BAL中嗜酸性粒细胞数量的增加与临床测量参数的损害相关,如:血气通气水平和住院时间。相反,嗜酸性粒细胞水平和气体干扰与住院时间之间没有相关性。嗜酸性蛋白(MBP, ECP, EPX, EPO)并不是哮喘发作时唯一对肺细胞有害的蛋白,但它们在灌洗液中的水平与BAL中嗜酸性程度相关的事实是显而易见的,因此BAL中嗜酸性蛋白的数量与临床测量参数的损害之间的相关性是明确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信