Inclusion by Co-Production of Social Housing: The Slovak Experience

Mária Murray Svidroňová, Beáta Mikušová Meričková, J. Nemec
{"title":"Inclusion by Co-Production of Social Housing: The Slovak Experience","authors":"Mária Murray Svidroňová, Beáta Mikušová Meričková, J. Nemec","doi":"10.17573/cepar.2019.2.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The field of social housing is one of many subjected to the potentials of co-production. Specifically, the Sustainable Development Goals target 11.1 is “By 2030, ensure access for all to adequate, safe and affordable housing and basic services and upgrade slums”. The current Slovak “State Housing Policy Concept to 2020”, among others, defines specific objectives, e.g. increasing or at least maintaining the same share of public expenditure on housing, introducing a new housing allowance, and supporting the development of the non-profit sector in housing provision. The goal of this article is to investigate to what extent co-production – as joint working of the public, private for profit and private not-for profit sectors – has the capacity to address the gap in the provision of social housing in the Slovak Republic. Using the method of case study, the scale and forms of co-production in social housing are investigated and the key factors and barriers of co-production in this area are analysed. The authors suggest that co-production of social housing is the most efficient method of delivery of social housing, improves sustainability, and helps to include the beneficiaries into society. However, this approach requires extra energy from the stakeholders – especially from public officials – and is thus still rarely used in practice.","PeriodicalId":409245,"journal":{"name":"NGO & Non-Profit Organizations eJournal","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NGO & Non-Profit Organizations eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17573/cepar.2019.2.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The field of social housing is one of many subjected to the potentials of co-production. Specifically, the Sustainable Development Goals target 11.1 is “By 2030, ensure access for all to adequate, safe and affordable housing and basic services and upgrade slums”. The current Slovak “State Housing Policy Concept to 2020”, among others, defines specific objectives, e.g. increasing or at least maintaining the same share of public expenditure on housing, introducing a new housing allowance, and supporting the development of the non-profit sector in housing provision. The goal of this article is to investigate to what extent co-production – as joint working of the public, private for profit and private not-for profit sectors – has the capacity to address the gap in the provision of social housing in the Slovak Republic. Using the method of case study, the scale and forms of co-production in social housing are investigated and the key factors and barriers of co-production in this area are analysed. The authors suggest that co-production of social housing is the most efficient method of delivery of social housing, improves sustainability, and helps to include the beneficiaries into society. However, this approach requires extra energy from the stakeholders – especially from public officials – and is thus still rarely used in practice.
社会住房联合生产的包容性:斯洛伐克的经验
社会住房领域是受合作生产潜力影响的众多领域之一。具体而言,可持续发展目标11.1是“到2030年,确保所有人都能获得适当、安全和负担得起的住房和基本服务,并改造贫民窟”。目前的斯洛伐克“到2020年国家住房政策概念”除其他外,确定了具体目标,例如增加或至少保持住房公共支出的相同份额,实行新的住房津贴,并支持发展提供住房的非营利性部门。本文的目的是调查合作生产- -作为公共部门、私营营利性部门和私营非营利性部门的联合工作- -在多大程度上有能力解决斯洛伐克共和国社会住房供应方面的差距。运用案例研究的方法,对社会住房合作生产的规模和形式进行了调查,并分析了该地区合作生产的关键因素和障碍。作者认为,共同生产社会住房是提供社会住房最有效的方法,提高了可持续性,并有助于将受益者纳入社会。然而,这种方法需要利益攸关方,特别是政府官员的额外精力,因此在实践中仍然很少使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信