Preliminary Findings of Correlations between School Leaders’ Strategic Leadership Practice, Quality Assurance System Practice and Risky and Non-Risky Malaysian Schools

Hemathy Kunalan, H. Ali
{"title":"Preliminary Findings of Correlations between School Leaders’ Strategic Leadership Practice, Quality Assurance System Practice and Risky and Non-Risky Malaysian Schools","authors":"Hemathy Kunalan, H. Ali","doi":"10.12816/0059146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is investigating the correlations between school leaders’ strategic leadership practice (SL), quality assurance system practice (QA), and risky and non-risky schools (RNS) in Malaysia by employing a quantitative survey approach. The purpose was to examine the educational leaders’ perceptions on SL, QA, and RNS in Malaysia as well as to determine whether there is a statistically significant difference among these variables. The data were collected from 77 educational leaders from selected 20 Malaysian national secondary schools in Kuala Lumpur (Federal Territory) and Selangor. The research instrument was a set of five-rating scale questionnaire. For the data interpretation, nonparametric correlations, specifically Spearman’s correlation, t-test, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were performed to test the hypotheses. The results showed a significant correlation between school leaders’ SL and QA (p = .000). However, the correlations of both variables with RNS Malaysian schools were insignificant statistically. The results of t-test that compared the dependent variables (SL, QA, and RNS) with the independent variable (gender) proved no statistically significant difference in SL, QA, and RNS between male and female educational leaders. Finally, the results of the ANOVA and post hoc analyses disclosed statistically significant difference between groups exist, for both professional qualifications as well as current position as an educational leader with SL and QA, but results were insignificant with RNS. This study provides evidence of the positive relationship between school leaders’ strategic leadership practice and quality assurance system practice. Such knowledge may shed some light on the school leaders about the factors that may potentially reduce the risky cases in Malaysian schools. This preliminary finding is considered as one of the dearth studies related to factors affecting the risky and non-risky schools in Malaysia.","PeriodicalId":225616,"journal":{"name":"Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12816/0059146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper is investigating the correlations between school leaders’ strategic leadership practice (SL), quality assurance system practice (QA), and risky and non-risky schools (RNS) in Malaysia by employing a quantitative survey approach. The purpose was to examine the educational leaders’ perceptions on SL, QA, and RNS in Malaysia as well as to determine whether there is a statistically significant difference among these variables. The data were collected from 77 educational leaders from selected 20 Malaysian national secondary schools in Kuala Lumpur (Federal Territory) and Selangor. The research instrument was a set of five-rating scale questionnaire. For the data interpretation, nonparametric correlations, specifically Spearman’s correlation, t-test, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were performed to test the hypotheses. The results showed a significant correlation between school leaders’ SL and QA (p = .000). However, the correlations of both variables with RNS Malaysian schools were insignificant statistically. The results of t-test that compared the dependent variables (SL, QA, and RNS) with the independent variable (gender) proved no statistically significant difference in SL, QA, and RNS between male and female educational leaders. Finally, the results of the ANOVA and post hoc analyses disclosed statistically significant difference between groups exist, for both professional qualifications as well as current position as an educational leader with SL and QA, but results were insignificant with RNS. This study provides evidence of the positive relationship between school leaders’ strategic leadership practice and quality assurance system practice. Such knowledge may shed some light on the school leaders about the factors that may potentially reduce the risky cases in Malaysian schools. This preliminary finding is considered as one of the dearth studies related to factors affecting the risky and non-risky schools in Malaysia.
学校领导的战略领导实践,质量保证体系实践与马来西亚风险和非风险学校之间的相关性的初步发现
本文调查学校领导之间的相关性的战略领导实践(SL),质量保证体系实践(QA),和高风险和清帐学校(RNS)在马来西亚采用定量调查方法。目的是检查教育领导人的看法在SL、QA和RNS在马来西亚以及确定这些变量之间是否存在统计上的显著差异。数据是从吉隆坡(联邦直辖区)和雪兰莪州选定的20所马来西亚国立中学的77位教育领袖中收集的。研究工具为一套五级问卷。对于数据解释,采用非参数相关性,特别是Spearman相关,t检验和方差分析(ANOVA)来检验假设。结果显示,学校领导的语言水平与质量之间存在显著的相关关系(p = 0.000)。然而,这两个变量与RNS马来西亚学校的相关性在统计上不显著。因变量(SL、QA、RNS)与自变量(性别)比较的t检验结果表明,男女教育领导者在SL、QA、RNS上无统计学差异。最后,方差分析和事后分析的结果显示,在SL和QA组中,专业资格和目前的教育领导职位在组间存在统计学显著差异,但在RNS组中结果不显著。该研究提供了证据之间的积极关系学校领导人的战略领导实践和质量保证体系的实践。这些知识可能会给学校领导带来一些启示,让他们了解哪些因素可能会减少马来西亚学校的风险案例。这一初步发现被认为是与影响马来西亚风险和非风险学校的因素有关的贫乏研究之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信