Evaluation of Performance Index Methodology for Power Network Contingency Ranking

B. O. Adewolu, A. Saha
{"title":"Evaluation of Performance Index Methodology for Power Network Contingency Ranking","authors":"B. O. Adewolu, A. Saha","doi":"10.1109/SAUPEC/RobMech/PRASA48453.2020.9041137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Line outage contingency ranking and analyses using various Performance Index (PI) approaches are investigated in this study. Independent contingency rankings based on voltage, real power, reactive power, voltage fused with reactive power and real power amalgamated with voltage fused reactive power PI are the ranking methods used. Analyses of most severe contingencies resulting from different ranking methods are carried out and the behavioural patterns of the affected transmission lines investigated and validated. Newton Raphson power flow equations developed in Matlab environment are used for these analyses while IEEE 30 bus network is the test system. Line 28–27 outage which is the most severe contingency based on voltage PI ranking resulted into both line overloads and bus voltage limits violations, while outage of line 2–5 which is the most severe contingency consequent of real power PI ranking only resulted into line thermal limits violations.","PeriodicalId":215514,"journal":{"name":"2020 International SAUPEC/RobMech/PRASA Conference","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International SAUPEC/RobMech/PRASA Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SAUPEC/RobMech/PRASA48453.2020.9041137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Line outage contingency ranking and analyses using various Performance Index (PI) approaches are investigated in this study. Independent contingency rankings based on voltage, real power, reactive power, voltage fused with reactive power and real power amalgamated with voltage fused reactive power PI are the ranking methods used. Analyses of most severe contingencies resulting from different ranking methods are carried out and the behavioural patterns of the affected transmission lines investigated and validated. Newton Raphson power flow equations developed in Matlab environment are used for these analyses while IEEE 30 bus network is the test system. Line 28–27 outage which is the most severe contingency based on voltage PI ranking resulted into both line overloads and bus voltage limits violations, while outage of line 2–5 which is the most severe contingency consequent of real power PI ranking only resulted into line thermal limits violations.
电网应急排序的性能指标评价方法
本研究采用不同的绩效指数(PI)方法对线路中断事故进行排序和分析。采用基于电压、实电、无功、电压融合无功、电压融合无功PI的独立应急排序方法。对不同排序方法导致的最严重突发事件进行了分析,并对受影响的输电线路的行为模式进行了调查和验证。本文采用Matlab环境下的Newton Raphson功率流方程进行分析,以IEEE 30总线网络为测试系统。基于电压PI排序的最严重事故线28-27号停电导致线路过载和母线电压限值违规,而基于实际功率PI排序的最严重事故线2-5号停电仅导致线路热限值违规。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信