{"title":"Design and Craft Education in Icelandic Schools","authors":"G. Thorsteinsson, Brynjar Olafsson","doi":"10.18999/bulitv.9.59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reports research undertakings that looked at the background, position, understanding of and attitude to Design and Craft (Hönnun og smíði) in Icelandic elementary schools. The main findings showed that certain views of Design and Craft need to be better defined to make stronger its standpoint isiden the school system. Terms and concepts were not enough defined and research on Design and Craft education was wanting. The participants’ attitudes to Design and Craft were positive and the Design and Craft was popular amongst students. Nevertheless, findings showed a little understanding of the dissimilarity between basic concepts such as Art, Design and Craft. Every of the interviewees thought Design and Craft were significant subjects for individualized education and wanted to give them a more prominent role in general education. Design and Craft in the Icelandic National Curriculum has not been fully realised. The research acknowledged that schools have not allocated additional hours for the subjects, yet though local authorities were helpful and flexibility existed in the time timetable. Lack of capital was, in addition, not a obstacle to enlarged Design and Craft education.","PeriodicalId":154366,"journal":{"name":"Vocational and Technical Education","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vocational and Technical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18999/bulitv.9.59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper reports research undertakings that looked at the background, position, understanding of and attitude to Design and Craft (Hönnun og smíði) in Icelandic elementary schools. The main findings showed that certain views of Design and Craft need to be better defined to make stronger its standpoint isiden the school system. Terms and concepts were not enough defined and research on Design and Craft education was wanting. The participants’ attitudes to Design and Craft were positive and the Design and Craft was popular amongst students. Nevertheless, findings showed a little understanding of the dissimilarity between basic concepts such as Art, Design and Craft. Every of the interviewees thought Design and Craft were significant subjects for individualized education and wanted to give them a more prominent role in general education. Design and Craft in the Icelandic National Curriculum has not been fully realised. The research acknowledged that schools have not allocated additional hours for the subjects, yet though local authorities were helpful and flexibility existed in the time timetable. Lack of capital was, in addition, not a obstacle to enlarged Design and Craft education.
本文报道了冰岛小学对设计和工艺(Hönnun og smíði)的背景、地位、理解和态度的研究工作。主要研究结果表明,设计与工艺的某些观点需要更好地定义,以使其在学校系统中的立场更强。术语和概念的定义不够,设计和工艺教育的研究缺乏。参加者对“设计与工艺”的态度积极,“设计与工艺”课程深受同学欢迎。然而,调查结果显示,人们对艺术、设计和工艺等基本概念之间的差异知之甚少。每个受访者都认为设计和工艺是个性化教育的重要科目,希望在通识教育中发挥更突出的作用。冰岛国家课程中的设计和工艺尚未完全实现。该研究承认,学校并没有为这些科目分配额外的时间,尽管地方当局提供了帮助,而且时间安排也很灵活。此外,缺乏资金并不是扩大设计和工艺教育的障碍。