Comparison of high-flow nasal cannula and conventional oxygen therapy following extubation after pediatric cardiac surgery: a retrospective study

Ö. Şavluk, A. A. Yılmaz, Y. Yavuz, Fatma Ukil Işıldak, Babürhan Özbek, Ergi̇n Arslanoğlu, N. Çine, H. Ceyran
{"title":"Comparison of high-flow nasal cannula and conventional oxygen therapy following extubation after pediatric cardiac surgery: a retrospective study","authors":"Ö. Şavluk, A. A. Yılmaz, Y. Yavuz, Fatma Ukil Işıldak, Babürhan Özbek, Ergi̇n Arslanoğlu, N. Çine, H. Ceyran","doi":"10.51645/KHJ.2021.M92","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Infants and children with congenital heart disease may develop respiratory failure in association with cardiac surgery or as a result of heart disease. In fact, the postextubation period in this group of patients can be complex and the use of continuous positive airway pressure or non-invasive ventilation may be necessary if conventional oxygen therapy is not sufficient. The aim of our study was to compare efficiency and outcomes of high-flow nasal cannula or conventional oxygen therapy post-extubation after pediatric cardiac surgery .\n Patients and Methods: A single centre retrospective study was conducted between January and december 2020 in our 12 beds pediatric cardiac intensive care unit. Patients were divided into two groups. In one group 45 patients (Group I), those who received high-flow nasal cannula after extubation, and in the other group 45 patients (Group II), those who received oxygen therapy with a mask after extubation. The aim of the study was to evaluate the relative efficacy of high flow nasal cannula and conventional oxygen therapy on PaCO2 ,PaO2 and PaO2/FiO2.\n Results: PaO2 values at 1, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h post-extubation were significantly higher in high-flow nasal cannula group (p<0,05). PaCO2 values were significantly lower in the high-flow nasal cannula group at 1, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h post-extubation (p=0,01). PaO2/FiO2 values in high-flow nasal cannula group at all-time points post-extubation were significantly higher than in conventional oxygen therapy group (p=0,01).\n Conclusion: High-flow nasal cannula is useful in decreasing PaCO2 and improving PaO2 in children following extubation after cardiac surgery. In addition, the simplicity of and tolerability to high-flow nasal cannula is also important. Although more expensive, the use of high-flow nasal cannula can be considered as a safe and effective alternative to conventional oxygen therapy following pediatric cardiac surgery.","PeriodicalId":239985,"journal":{"name":"Koşuyolu Heart Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Koşuyolu Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51645/KHJ.2021.M92","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: Infants and children with congenital heart disease may develop respiratory failure in association with cardiac surgery or as a result of heart disease. In fact, the postextubation period in this group of patients can be complex and the use of continuous positive airway pressure or non-invasive ventilation may be necessary if conventional oxygen therapy is not sufficient. The aim of our study was to compare efficiency and outcomes of high-flow nasal cannula or conventional oxygen therapy post-extubation after pediatric cardiac surgery . Patients and Methods: A single centre retrospective study was conducted between January and december 2020 in our 12 beds pediatric cardiac intensive care unit. Patients were divided into two groups. In one group 45 patients (Group I), those who received high-flow nasal cannula after extubation, and in the other group 45 patients (Group II), those who received oxygen therapy with a mask after extubation. The aim of the study was to evaluate the relative efficacy of high flow nasal cannula and conventional oxygen therapy on PaCO2 ,PaO2 and PaO2/FiO2. Results: PaO2 values at 1, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h post-extubation were significantly higher in high-flow nasal cannula group (p<0,05). PaCO2 values were significantly lower in the high-flow nasal cannula group at 1, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h post-extubation (p=0,01). PaO2/FiO2 values in high-flow nasal cannula group at all-time points post-extubation were significantly higher than in conventional oxygen therapy group (p=0,01). Conclusion: High-flow nasal cannula is useful in decreasing PaCO2 and improving PaO2 in children following extubation after cardiac surgery. In addition, the simplicity of and tolerability to high-flow nasal cannula is also important. Although more expensive, the use of high-flow nasal cannula can be considered as a safe and effective alternative to conventional oxygen therapy following pediatric cardiac surgery.
小儿心脏手术后拔管后高流量鼻插管与常规氧疗的比较:一项回顾性研究
目的:患有先天性心脏病的婴儿和儿童可能在心脏手术或心脏病的结果下发生呼吸衰竭。事实上,这组患者拔管后的时间可能很复杂,如果常规氧疗不足,可能需要使用持续气道正压通气或无创通气。本研究的目的是比较小儿心脏手术后拔管后高流量鼻插管和常规氧疗的效率和结果。患者和方法:2020年1月至12月,在我们12张床位的儿科心脏重症监护室进行了一项单中心回顾性研究。患者分为两组。其中一组45例患者(I组)拔管后使用高流量鼻插管,另一组45例患者(II组)拔管后使用面罩吸氧。本研究旨在评价高流量鼻插管与常规氧疗对PaCO2、PaO2及PaO2/FiO2的相对疗效。结果:高流量鼻插管组拔管后1、6、12、24、48 h PaO2值显著高于对照组(p< 0.05)。高流量鼻插管组在拔管后1、6、12、24、48 h的PaCO2值显著低于对照组(p= 0.01)。高流量鼻插管组拔管后各时间点PaO2/FiO2值显著高于常规氧疗组(p= 0.01)。结论:高流量鼻插管可降低患儿心脏术后拔管后PaCO2,改善PaO2。此外,高流量鼻插管的简单性和耐受性也很重要。虽然费用较高,但在小儿心脏手术后使用高流量鼻插管可以被认为是一种安全有效的替代传统氧疗的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信