Validity and Reliability of the Pedagogical Leadership Scale: Mixed Methods Research

Savaş Varlik, Sath Sorm, I. Gunbayı
{"title":"Validity and Reliability of the Pedagogical Leadership Scale: Mixed Methods Research","authors":"Savaş Varlik, Sath Sorm, I. Gunbayı","doi":"10.14689/jomes.2021.4.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"30.June.2021 Accepted: 20.July.2021 Abstract. This research, which aims to determine the validity and reliability of the pedagogical leadership scale, is a mixed method research that includes quantitative and qualitative research approaches as a method. This research used a multi-phase mixed design based on examination through a cycle of quantitative and qualitative research aligned sequentially with each new approach that builds on what has already been learned. It can be said that this research, in which the paradigm of the research, quantitative and qualitative approaches are used, is gathered under the umbrella of pragmatism, which brings together the philosophy of both realism and idealism, which is a final world view oriented to practice whatever works. The universe of the research was determined as the education administrators working in public schools in Karatay, Meram and Selçuklu districts located in the city center of Konya. By calculating the sample size, n=234 education administrators were reached. For the analysis of the data, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyzes and reliability analyzes were performed. As a result of the findings, it was concluded that the pedagogical leadership scale is a valid and reliable measurement","PeriodicalId":207840,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mixed Methods Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mixed Methods Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14689/jomes.2021.4.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

30.June.2021 Accepted: 20.July.2021 Abstract. This research, which aims to determine the validity and reliability of the pedagogical leadership scale, is a mixed method research that includes quantitative and qualitative research approaches as a method. This research used a multi-phase mixed design based on examination through a cycle of quantitative and qualitative research aligned sequentially with each new approach that builds on what has already been learned. It can be said that this research, in which the paradigm of the research, quantitative and qualitative approaches are used, is gathered under the umbrella of pragmatism, which brings together the philosophy of both realism and idealism, which is a final world view oriented to practice whatever works. The universe of the research was determined as the education administrators working in public schools in Karatay, Meram and Selçuklu districts located in the city center of Konya. By calculating the sample size, n=234 education administrators were reached. For the analysis of the data, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyzes and reliability analyzes were performed. As a result of the findings, it was concluded that the pedagogical leadership scale is a valid and reliable measurement
教学领导量表的效度与信度:混合方法研究
30. june.2021接受:20. july.2021摘要本研究旨在确定教学领导量表的效度和信度,是一种混合方法研究,包括定量和定性研究方法作为一种方法。本研究采用了一种多阶段混合设计,该设计基于定量和定性研究循环的检验,并与建立在已有知识基础上的每种新方法相一致。可以说,本研究运用了研究范式、定量方法和定性方法,是在实用主义的保护伞下进行的,它汇集了现实主义和理想主义两种哲学,是一种以实践为导向的最终世界观。研究对象为位于科尼亚市中心的Karatay、Meram和seluklu地区公立学校的教育管理人员。通过计算样本量,共得到n=234名教育管理人员。对数据进行了探索性、验证性因素分析和信度分析。研究结果表明,教学领导量表是一种有效、可靠的测量方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信