Failures in the Child Perspective

Sylwia Koziel, L. Hultman, Y. Weitz, Hanna Bertilsdotter Rosqvist, Magdalena Elmersjö
{"title":"Failures in the Child Perspective","authors":"Sylwia Koziel, L. Hultman, Y. Weitz, Hanna Bertilsdotter Rosqvist, Magdalena Elmersjö","doi":"10.1163/15718182-31020006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nChildren’s invisibility, non-participation or limited participation can be associated with social workers’ experiences of losing focus of the child in their work, while at the same time navigating organisational and legal demands where a child perspective is strongly promoted. This article sheds light on social workers’ experiences of working with a child perspective and with children’s participation. Six in-depth interviews were conducted with professionals from social services and ngo s and from different child welfare services in Sweden. Our findings indicate that losing focus of the child is a common phenomenon that relates to the dominance of adult-centred practice and that child-centred methods need to be developed. Social workers from ngo s described having better opportunities for working in a child-centred way. Losing focus of the child mirrors the subordinated position of child-centred practice, proving that a child perspective and children’s participation are still inadequately anchored in social work practice.","PeriodicalId":217193,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Children’s Rights","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Children’s Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-31020006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Children’s invisibility, non-participation or limited participation can be associated with social workers’ experiences of losing focus of the child in their work, while at the same time navigating organisational and legal demands where a child perspective is strongly promoted. This article sheds light on social workers’ experiences of working with a child perspective and with children’s participation. Six in-depth interviews were conducted with professionals from social services and ngo s and from different child welfare services in Sweden. Our findings indicate that losing focus of the child is a common phenomenon that relates to the dominance of adult-centred practice and that child-centred methods need to be developed. Social workers from ngo s described having better opportunities for working in a child-centred way. Losing focus of the child mirrors the subordinated position of child-centred practice, proving that a child perspective and children’s participation are still inadequately anchored in social work practice.
从孩子的角度看失败
儿童的隐形、不参与或有限参与可能与社会工作者在工作中失去对儿童的关注的经历有关,同时在强烈提倡儿童观点的组织和法律要求中导航。这篇文章阐明了社会工作者从儿童的角度和儿童参与工作的经验。与瑞典社会服务和非政府组织以及不同儿童福利服务机构的专业人员进行了六次深入访谈。我们的研究结果表明,失去对儿童的关注是一种普遍现象,这与以成人为中心的实践占主导地位有关,需要开发以儿童为中心的方法。非政府组织的社会工作者说,他们有更好的机会以儿童为中心的方式工作。失去对儿童的关注反映了以儿童为中心的实践的从属地位,证明儿童的观点和儿童的参与在社会工作实践中仍然没有得到充分的巩固。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信