Agents Provocateurs: State Infiltration in BlacKkKlansman and the Greensboro Massacre

Benjamin Schmack
{"title":"Agents Provocateurs: State Infiltration in BlacKkKlansman and the Greensboro Massacre","authors":"Benjamin Schmack","doi":"10.25071/1913-9632.39636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2018, director Boots Riley posted a short, but scathing critique of the film BlacKkKlansman to his Twitter. His criticism emanates mostly from the film’s portrayal of the real-life police detective Ron Stallworth as a hero and its numerous omissions regarding Stallworth’s infiltration of Leftist groups. Much of Riley’s commentary focuses on the film’s failure to account for the police as a foundational aspect of everyday white supremacy, but his essay also speak to the consistent use of white nationalist forces by the State to suppress Leftist and Black radical activism. This paper uses both the film and memoir BlacKkKlansman, as well as Riley’s critique, to frame an analysis of the Klan as a synergistic form of State, white nationalist, and anticommunist repression against a broad spectrum of Leftist activism. Beyond Stallworth, I focus on the Greensboro Massacre of 1979, in which Klansmen and Neo-Nazis murdered five Communist Worker’s Party organizers. The events in Greensboro prove a far more representative example of the true nature of police infiltration of radical groups than those presented in BlacKkKlansman. I argue that despite the popular belief that the Klan and Communist groups constitute the disavowed fringes of American society, the State has routinely provided a space for the Klan’s existence while it has simultaneously persecuted, villainized, and criminalized American Communists and Black radicals. This is borne out by the fact that there has rarely, if ever, been a point where the violence of the Klan has not been favored by law enforcement and government officials over the activism of the Klan’s radical adversaries.","PeriodicalId":143418,"journal":{"name":"Left History: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Historical Inquiry and Debate","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Left History: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Historical Inquiry and Debate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25071/1913-9632.39636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2018, director Boots Riley posted a short, but scathing critique of the film BlacKkKlansman to his Twitter. His criticism emanates mostly from the film’s portrayal of the real-life police detective Ron Stallworth as a hero and its numerous omissions regarding Stallworth’s infiltration of Leftist groups. Much of Riley’s commentary focuses on the film’s failure to account for the police as a foundational aspect of everyday white supremacy, but his essay also speak to the consistent use of white nationalist forces by the State to suppress Leftist and Black radical activism. This paper uses both the film and memoir BlacKkKlansman, as well as Riley’s critique, to frame an analysis of the Klan as a synergistic form of State, white nationalist, and anticommunist repression against a broad spectrum of Leftist activism. Beyond Stallworth, I focus on the Greensboro Massacre of 1979, in which Klansmen and Neo-Nazis murdered five Communist Worker’s Party organizers. The events in Greensboro prove a far more representative example of the true nature of police infiltration of radical groups than those presented in BlacKkKlansman. I argue that despite the popular belief that the Klan and Communist groups constitute the disavowed fringes of American society, the State has routinely provided a space for the Klan’s existence while it has simultaneously persecuted, villainized, and criminalized American Communists and Black radicals. This is borne out by the fact that there has rarely, if ever, been a point where the violence of the Klan has not been favored by law enforcement and government officials over the activism of the Klan’s radical adversaries.
密探:黑三党的国家渗透和格林斯博罗大屠杀
2018年,导演博茨·莱利(Boots Riley)在推特上发布了一段简短但严厉的评论,批评了电影《黑党徒》(BlacKkKlansman)。他的批评主要来自于这部电影对现实生活中的警探罗恩·斯托沃斯(Ron Stallworth)的英雄形象的描绘,以及对斯托沃斯渗透左翼组织的大量遗漏。莱利的大部分评论都集中在这部电影未能将警察作为日常白人至上主义的一个基本方面,但他的文章也谈到了国家一贯使用白人民族主义力量来镇压左派和黑人激进主义。本文利用电影和回忆录《黑人三k党》以及莱利的批评,将三k党分析为国家、白人民族主义和反共镇压的协同形式,以对抗广泛的左翼激进主义。除了斯托沃斯,我还关注了1979年的格林斯博罗大屠杀,三k党和新纳粹分子杀害了五名共产主义工人党组织者。格林斯博罗的事件证明了警察渗透激进组织的真实本质比黑k党事件更具代表性。我认为,尽管人们普遍认为三k党和共产主义团体构成了美国社会被否认的边缘,但国家在为三k党提供生存空间的同时,也在迫害、诋毁和定罪美国共产主义者和黑人激进分子。事实证明,执法部门和政府官员对三k党的暴力行为的支持,几乎从来没有超过三k党的激进对手的行动主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信