ProfileGuard: Privacy Preserving Obfuscation for Mobile User Profiles

Imdad Ullah, R. Boreli, S. Kanhere, Sanjay Chawla
{"title":"ProfileGuard: Privacy Preserving Obfuscation for Mobile User Profiles","authors":"Imdad Ullah, R. Boreli, S. Kanhere, Sanjay Chawla","doi":"10.1145/2665943.2665961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analytics companies have become an integral part of the mobile advertising industry, enabling successful user targeting via user profiles, derived from the mobile apps installed by specific users. This poses a threat to privacy of such users, when apps indicating sensitive information, e.g., a gaming app showing a gambling problem, are the basis for profiling. In this paper, we propose a ProfileGuard, novel app-based obfuscation mechanism to remove the dominance (prevalence amongst the interest categories present in a user profile) of selected private user profile interest categories. We show, based on extensive experimental evaluation using 2700 Android apps during a 9 month test campaign, that the best trade-off between the level of effort required by the obfuscating system and the resulting privacy protection can be achieved by choosing the obfuscating apps based on similarity with user's existing apps (while ensuring that the selected apps belong to a non-private category). We implement a POC ProfileGuard app to demonstrate the feasibility of an automated obfuscation mechanism. We also provide insights into the broad Google AdMob profiling rules, showing that there is a deterministic mapping of individual apps to profile interests, that profiles based on multiple apps represent a union of individual app profiles and that there is a minimum level of activity necessary for AdMob to build a stable user profile. Finally, we show the resulting effect of obfuscation on the received ads, demonstrating that modifying user profiles to include a richer set of interests results in correspondingly more diverse received ads.","PeriodicalId":408627,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 13th Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2665943.2665961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Analytics companies have become an integral part of the mobile advertising industry, enabling successful user targeting via user profiles, derived from the mobile apps installed by specific users. This poses a threat to privacy of such users, when apps indicating sensitive information, e.g., a gaming app showing a gambling problem, are the basis for profiling. In this paper, we propose a ProfileGuard, novel app-based obfuscation mechanism to remove the dominance (prevalence amongst the interest categories present in a user profile) of selected private user profile interest categories. We show, based on extensive experimental evaluation using 2700 Android apps during a 9 month test campaign, that the best trade-off between the level of effort required by the obfuscating system and the resulting privacy protection can be achieved by choosing the obfuscating apps based on similarity with user's existing apps (while ensuring that the selected apps belong to a non-private category). We implement a POC ProfileGuard app to demonstrate the feasibility of an automated obfuscation mechanism. We also provide insights into the broad Google AdMob profiling rules, showing that there is a deterministic mapping of individual apps to profile interests, that profiles based on multiple apps represent a union of individual app profiles and that there is a minimum level of activity necessary for AdMob to build a stable user profile. Finally, we show the resulting effect of obfuscation on the received ads, demonstrating that modifying user profiles to include a richer set of interests results in correspondingly more diverse received ads.
ProfileGuard:隐私保护混淆的移动用户配置文件
分析公司已经成为移动广告行业不可或缺的一部分,通过特定用户安装的移动应用获取用户档案,从而成功定位用户。当显示敏感信息的应用程序(例如显示赌博问题的游戏应用程序)成为分析的基础时,这对此类用户的隐私构成了威胁。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的基于应用程序的混淆机制ProfileGuard,以消除选定的私人用户配置文件兴趣类别的主导地位(在用户配置文件中存在的兴趣类别中流行)。我们显示,基于在9个月的测试活动中使用2700个Android应用程序的广泛实验评估,可以通过基于与用户现有应用程序的相似性选择混淆应用程序来实现混淆系统所需的努力水平和由此产生的隐私保护之间的最佳权衡(同时确保所选应用程序属于非私人类别)。我们实现了一个POC ProfileGuard应用程序来演示自动混淆机制的可行性。我们还提供了对广泛的Google AdMob分析规则的见解,表明单个应用与个人资料兴趣之间存在确定性映射,基于多个应用的个人资料代表了单个应用资料的联合,并且AdMob建立稳定的用户资料所需的最低活动水平。最后,我们展示了混淆对收到的广告的影响,表明修改用户配置文件以包含更丰富的兴趣集会导致收到的广告相应更多样化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信