Detecting Ponzi Finance: An Evolutionary Approach to the Measure of Financial Fragility

Éric Tymoigne
{"title":"Detecting Ponzi Finance: An Evolutionary Approach to the Measure of Financial Fragility","authors":"Éric Tymoigne","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1632893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Different frameworks of analysis lead to different conceptions of financial instability and financial fragility. On one side, the static approach conceptualizes financial instability as an unfortunate byproduct of capitalism that results from unpredictable random forces that no one can do anything about except prepare for through adequate loss reserves, capital, and liquidation buffers. On the other side, the evolutionary approach conceptualizes financial instability as something that the current economic system invariably brings upon itself through internal market and nonmarket forces, and that requires change in financial practices rather than merely good financial buffers. This paper compares the two approaches in order to lay the foundation for the empirical analysis developed within the evolutionary approach. The paper shows that, with the use of macroeconomic data, it is possible to detect financial fragility, especially Ponzi finance. The methodology is applied to residential housing in the U.S. household sector and is able to capture some of the trends that are known to be sources of economic difficulties. Notably, the paper finds that Ponzi finance was going on in the housing sector from at least 2004 to 2007, which concurs with other works based on more detailed data.","PeriodicalId":129015,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Marxian; Sraffian; Institutional; Evolutionary (Topic)","volume":"749 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Marxian; Sraffian; Institutional; Evolutionary (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1632893","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Different frameworks of analysis lead to different conceptions of financial instability and financial fragility. On one side, the static approach conceptualizes financial instability as an unfortunate byproduct of capitalism that results from unpredictable random forces that no one can do anything about except prepare for through adequate loss reserves, capital, and liquidation buffers. On the other side, the evolutionary approach conceptualizes financial instability as something that the current economic system invariably brings upon itself through internal market and nonmarket forces, and that requires change in financial practices rather than merely good financial buffers. This paper compares the two approaches in order to lay the foundation for the empirical analysis developed within the evolutionary approach. The paper shows that, with the use of macroeconomic data, it is possible to detect financial fragility, especially Ponzi finance. The methodology is applied to residential housing in the U.S. household sector and is able to capture some of the trends that are known to be sources of economic difficulties. Notably, the paper finds that Ponzi finance was going on in the housing sector from at least 2004 to 2007, which concurs with other works based on more detailed data.
侦测庞氏金融:衡量金融脆弱性的演化方法
不同的分析框架导致不同的金融不稳定性和金融脆弱性的概念。一方面,静态方法将金融不稳定概念化为资本主义的不幸副产品,它是由不可预测的随机力量造成的,除了通过充足的损失准备金、资本和清算缓冲做好准备之外,没有人能做任何事情。另一方面,进化方法将金融不稳定概念化为当前经济体系通过内部市场和非市场力量不可避免地给自己带来的东西,这需要改变金融实践,而不仅仅是良好的金融缓冲。本文对这两种方法进行了比较,以便为进化方法中发展起来的实证分析奠定基础。本文表明,通过使用宏观经济数据,可以发现金融脆弱性,特别是庞氏金融。该方法适用于美国家庭部门的住宅,能够捕捉到一些已知是经济困难来源的趋势。值得注意的是,这篇论文发现,至少从2004年到2007年,庞氏金融在房地产领域一直存在,这与其他基于更详细数据的研究结果一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信