Comparative Evaluation Of Push Out Bond Strength Of Endosequence Bc Sealer As Against Mta Plus Sealers When Used With Different Obturation Techniques

M. Saoji
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation Of Push Out Bond Strength Of Endosequence Bc Sealer As Against Mta Plus Sealers When Used With Different Obturation Techniques","authors":"M. Saoji","doi":"10.54054/jodr.2022623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New technologies have led to the concept of recent bioactive dental materials, which makes the majority of today’s dentists to produce substantial endodontic results. The introduction of advanced material science made tremendous changes in the dental practice. Aim and Objectives : Aim of this study was to assess and compare the push-out bond strength of Endosequence Root Repair Material (ERRM putty), White Mineral trioxide aggregate (WMTA) and Biodentine after incubation in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) for 7 days, 30 days and 45 days. Materials and methods : 90 extracted single rooted human premolar teeth were used in this study. To avoid the desiccation of teeth after extraction, the teeth were kept in hydrogen peroxide solution and washed under tap water. Then the teeth were cleaned with pumice and stored in normal saline at 37˚C until use. The middle 1/3rd portion of each root was sectioned at right angle to the long axis to produce discs of 2.00 ± 0.05 mm thickness using a diamond disc with continuous water irrigation. Finally, 90 root slices were produced. The specimens were dipped in 17% EDTA for 3 min followed by 3 % NaOCl for the same period of time and then rinsed with distilled water and dried. The specimens were divided randomly into 3 groups: Group I- ERRM, Group II - White MTA, Group III- Biodentine. PBS solution was changed every 5 days to replenish the buffering capacity of the PBS. All specimens were incubated at 37ºC. After the completion of experiments, the specimens were sent to the push-out test. Analysis of data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics both. The software SPSS 17.0, EPI_INFO 6.0 version and Graph Pad Prism 5.0 version was used and p<0.05 is considered as level of significance. Result and conclusion : Highest push out bond strength was seen with ERRM at all incubation times followed by mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine .It has been observed that increase in the incubation time had increased push-out bond strength of the material significantly.","PeriodicalId":269506,"journal":{"name":"DMIMS Journal of Dental Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DMIMS Journal of Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54054/jodr.2022623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

New technologies have led to the concept of recent bioactive dental materials, which makes the majority of today’s dentists to produce substantial endodontic results. The introduction of advanced material science made tremendous changes in the dental practice. Aim and Objectives : Aim of this study was to assess and compare the push-out bond strength of Endosequence Root Repair Material (ERRM putty), White Mineral trioxide aggregate (WMTA) and Biodentine after incubation in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) for 7 days, 30 days and 45 days. Materials and methods : 90 extracted single rooted human premolar teeth were used in this study. To avoid the desiccation of teeth after extraction, the teeth were kept in hydrogen peroxide solution and washed under tap water. Then the teeth were cleaned with pumice and stored in normal saline at 37˚C until use. The middle 1/3rd portion of each root was sectioned at right angle to the long axis to produce discs of 2.00 ± 0.05 mm thickness using a diamond disc with continuous water irrigation. Finally, 90 root slices were produced. The specimens were dipped in 17% EDTA for 3 min followed by 3 % NaOCl for the same period of time and then rinsed with distilled water and dried. The specimens were divided randomly into 3 groups: Group I- ERRM, Group II - White MTA, Group III- Biodentine. PBS solution was changed every 5 days to replenish the buffering capacity of the PBS. All specimens were incubated at 37ºC. After the completion of experiments, the specimens were sent to the push-out test. Analysis of data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics both. The software SPSS 17.0, EPI_INFO 6.0 version and Graph Pad Prism 5.0 version was used and p<0.05 is considered as level of significance. Result and conclusion : Highest push out bond strength was seen with ERRM at all incubation times followed by mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine .It has been observed that increase in the incubation time had increased push-out bond strength of the material significantly.
不同封闭技术下内序Bc密封剂与Mta +密封剂推出结合强度的比较评价
新技术导致了最近生物活性牙科材料的概念,这使得今天大多数牙医产生实质性的牙髓治疗结果。先进材料科学的引入使牙科治疗发生了巨大的变化。目的和目的:本研究的目的是评估和比较内序列根修复材料(ERRM腻子)、白色矿物三氧化物骨料(WMTA)和Biodentine在磷酸盐缓冲盐水(PBS)中培养7天、30天和45天后的推出结合强度。材料与方法:90颗拔除的单根人前磨牙用于本研究。为避免拔牙后牙齿干燥,将牙齿保存在双氧水溶液中,并在自来水下清洗。然后用浮石清洁牙齿,37℃下置于生理盐水中保存待用。每根中间1/3部分与长轴成直角切片,用金刚石圆盘连续灌水,形成厚度为2.00±0.05 mm的圆盘。最后得到90根切片。将标本在17% EDTA中浸泡3分钟,然后在3% NaOCl中浸泡3分钟,然后用蒸馏水冲洗并干燥。将标本随机分为3组:I组- ERRM, II组- White MTA, III组- Biodentine。每5天更换一次PBS溶液,以补充PBS的缓冲能力。所有标本37℃孵育。实验完成后,试件进行推出试验。数据分析采用描述性统计和推理统计两种方法进行分析。软件采用SPSS 17.0, EPI_INFO 6.0版本,Graph Pad Prism 5.0版本,p<0.05为显著性水平。结果和结论:ERRM在所有孵育时间内的推出粘结强度最高,其次是矿物三氧化骨料和生物牙汀。我们观察到,随着孵育时间的增加,材料的推出粘结强度显著增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信