Health Advisors in Organic Meet Sheep Farms: The Role of the Veterinarians

J. Cabaret, M. Benoît, G. Laignel, C. Nicourt
{"title":"Health Advisors in Organic Meet Sheep Farms: The Role of the Veterinarians","authors":"J. Cabaret, M. Benoît, G. Laignel, C. Nicourt","doi":"10.2174/1874318801105010007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Farmers receive advice from various categories of advisors' regarding the health management of their flocks. With respect to disease control strategies, treatment recommendations typically include either an allopathic synthetic drug approach or a more organic complementary line using alternative medicine, or indeed, a combination of the two. This study aimed to determine the proportion of treatment options in use by farmers and to correlate the treatment recommendations to the different categories of health advisor. A set of 34 meat sheep farms from the centre of France was used in the restricted sampling study, this included a representative sample of both organic (n = 7) and conventional (n = 8) farms. Data on general health matters (e.g. cost of drugs, flock mortalities etc.) were collected from each of the farms. The study found conventional farms prescribed more to the recommendations made by veterinarians and spent more on synthetic allopathic drugs. The reverse situation was observed in organic farms which invested more money in alternative medicines as advised by mostly non-veterinarian health advisors, or guided by their own appreciation of disease management.","PeriodicalId":214092,"journal":{"name":"The Open Veterinary Science Journal","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Veterinary Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874318801105010007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Farmers receive advice from various categories of advisors' regarding the health management of their flocks. With respect to disease control strategies, treatment recommendations typically include either an allopathic synthetic drug approach or a more organic complementary line using alternative medicine, or indeed, a combination of the two. This study aimed to determine the proportion of treatment options in use by farmers and to correlate the treatment recommendations to the different categories of health advisor. A set of 34 meat sheep farms from the centre of France was used in the restricted sampling study, this included a representative sample of both organic (n = 7) and conventional (n = 8) farms. Data on general health matters (e.g. cost of drugs, flock mortalities etc.) were collected from each of the farms. The study found conventional farms prescribed more to the recommendations made by veterinarians and spent more on synthetic allopathic drugs. The reverse situation was observed in organic farms which invested more money in alternative medicines as advised by mostly non-veterinarian health advisors, or guided by their own appreciation of disease management.
有机绵羊农场的健康顾问:兽医的角色
农民从各种顾问那里得到关于其禽群健康管理的建议。关于疾病控制策略,治疗建议通常包括对抗合成药物方法或使用替代药物的更有机补充线,或者实际上是两者的结合。本研究旨在确定农民使用治疗方案的比例,并将治疗建议与不同类别的健康顾问联系起来。来自法国中部的34个肉羊农场被用于限制抽样研究,其中包括有机农场(n = 7)和传统农场(n = 8)的代表性样本。从每个农场收集了关于一般健康问题的数据(例如药品费用、畜群死亡率等)。研究发现,传统农场更多地按照兽医的建议开处方,花更多的钱在合成对抗药物上。相反的情况在有机农场中被观察到,这些农场在非兽医健康顾问的建议下,或者在他们自己对疾病管理的理解的指导下,投资了更多的钱在替代药物上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信