Cognitive e-learning resources

S. Christochevsky
{"title":"Cognitive e-learning resources","authors":"S. Christochevsky","doi":"10.32517/0234-0453-2022-37-6-45-51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents an analysis of some of the possibilities of traditional textbooks and e-learning resources. The possibilities of constructing de facto individual educational trajectories of students using traditional textbooks, which are currently absent in e-learning resources, are considered. Some shortcomings of e-learning resources are shown, related to the dominance of the video sequence in e-learning resources over other channels of influence on students and to the exaggeration of the role of interactivity of e-learning resources when they are used in the educational process. On the example of the Stroop test, the obligatory integration of various media, in particular the text and color design of e-learning resources, was noted. Attention is drawn to the effectiveness of the use of e-learning resources in various educational situations.Many mistakes of developers of e-learning resources are based on insufficient interaction between developers and psychologists. The creators of e-learning resources often incorrectly interpret the results obtained by psychologists. The article provides relevant examples, including the use of the mythical number seven (the principle that a person can work simultaneously with no more than seven blocks of information). Developers do not always use in their activities the communicative postulates of G. P. Grice, as well as the theory of cognitive load, according to which the developed e-learning resources should not overload the student’s brain. In psychology, the cognitive resource is more associated with aspects of human information processing. In the article, the concept of “cognitive resource” extends to resources “external” in relation to a person, including e-learning resources. The degree of cognition of the resource characterizes the ease of transferring to the student the information necessary for the educational process and the perception of this information by him.Attention is drawn to the need to use modern usability principles when building “transparent” interfaces of e-learning resources. As a result of the analysis of modern e-learning resources, recommendations are proposed for developers of e-learning resources on the creation of cognitive presentational electronic resources to increase their effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":277237,"journal":{"name":"Informatics and education","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatics and education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2022-37-6-45-51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents an analysis of some of the possibilities of traditional textbooks and e-learning resources. The possibilities of constructing de facto individual educational trajectories of students using traditional textbooks, which are currently absent in e-learning resources, are considered. Some shortcomings of e-learning resources are shown, related to the dominance of the video sequence in e-learning resources over other channels of influence on students and to the exaggeration of the role of interactivity of e-learning resources when they are used in the educational process. On the example of the Stroop test, the obligatory integration of various media, in particular the text and color design of e-learning resources, was noted. Attention is drawn to the effectiveness of the use of e-learning resources in various educational situations.Many mistakes of developers of e-learning resources are based on insufficient interaction between developers and psychologists. The creators of e-learning resources often incorrectly interpret the results obtained by psychologists. The article provides relevant examples, including the use of the mythical number seven (the principle that a person can work simultaneously with no more than seven blocks of information). Developers do not always use in their activities the communicative postulates of G. P. Grice, as well as the theory of cognitive load, according to which the developed e-learning resources should not overload the student’s brain. In psychology, the cognitive resource is more associated with aspects of human information processing. In the article, the concept of “cognitive resource” extends to resources “external” in relation to a person, including e-learning resources. The degree of cognition of the resource characterizes the ease of transferring to the student the information necessary for the educational process and the perception of this information by him.Attention is drawn to the need to use modern usability principles when building “transparent” interfaces of e-learning resources. As a result of the analysis of modern e-learning resources, recommendations are proposed for developers of e-learning resources on the creation of cognitive presentational electronic resources to increase their effectiveness.
认知电子学习资源
文章分析了传统教科书和电子学习资源的一些可能性。考虑使用传统教科书构建学生事实上的个人教育轨迹的可能性,这是目前在电子学习资源中缺失的。报告显示了电子学习资源的一些缺点,涉及电子学习资源中的视频序列在影响学生的其他渠道中占主导地位,以及在教育过程中使用电子学习资源时夸大了互动性的作用。以Stroop测试为例,指出了必须整合各种媒体,特别是电子学习资源的文本和颜色设计。人们注意到在各种教育情况下使用电子学习资源的有效性。电子学习资源开发者的许多错误都是基于开发者与心理学家之间的互动不足。电子学习资源的创造者经常错误地解释心理学家获得的结果。这篇文章提供了相关的例子,包括神话数字7的使用(一个人可以同时处理不超过7个信息块的原则)。开发人员并不总是在他们的活动中使用g.p. Grice的交际假设,以及认知负荷理论,根据该理论,开发的电子学习资源不应该使学生的大脑过载。在心理学中,认知资源更多地与人类信息处理的各个方面有关。在本文中,“认知资源”的概念扩展到与人相关的“外部”资源,包括电子学习资源。对资源的认知程度表征了向学生传递教育过程所需信息的难易程度以及学生对这些信息的感知程度。在构建电子学习资源的“透明”界面时,需要注意使用现代可用性原则。通过对现代电子学习资源的分析,为电子学习资源的开发人员提出了创建认知表征电子资源的建议,以提高其有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信