{"title":"A unified expression for split-radix DFT algorithms","authors":"G. Bi, Gang Li, Xiumei Li","doi":"10.1109/ICCCAS.2010.5581988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a unified expression that covers all previously reported split-radix-2/2m, where m is an integer larger than one, algorithms. New split-radix algorithms can be also derived from this unified expression. These algorithms flexibly support DFT sizes N = q · 2r, where q is generally an odd integer. Comparisons show that the computational complexity required by the proposed algorithms for the DFT size N = q · 2r is generally not more than that for the DFT size N = 2r. In particular, our examples show that the split-radix-2/4 algorithm requires a smaller computational complexity compared to other split-radix algorithms and the prime factor algorithms.","PeriodicalId":199950,"journal":{"name":"2010 International Conference on Communications, Circuits and Systems (ICCCAS)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 International Conference on Communications, Circuits and Systems (ICCCAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCAS.2010.5581988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
This paper presents a unified expression that covers all previously reported split-radix-2/2m, where m is an integer larger than one, algorithms. New split-radix algorithms can be also derived from this unified expression. These algorithms flexibly support DFT sizes N = q · 2r, where q is generally an odd integer. Comparisons show that the computational complexity required by the proposed algorithms for the DFT size N = q · 2r is generally not more than that for the DFT size N = 2r. In particular, our examples show that the split-radix-2/4 algorithm requires a smaller computational complexity compared to other split-radix algorithms and the prime factor algorithms.