Analisis validitas dan praktikalitas lembar kerja siswa berbasis konflik kognitif pada materi gerak lurus dan gerak parabola

Anni Fadhilah, Fatni Mufit, Asrizal Asrizal
{"title":"Analisis validitas dan praktikalitas lembar kerja siswa berbasis konflik kognitif pada materi gerak lurus dan gerak parabola","authors":"Anni Fadhilah, Fatni Mufit, Asrizal Asrizal","doi":"10.24036/7948171074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The era of the industrial revolution 4.0 which is very influential in human life today, especially in the field of education to create better generations for the nation. Education is demanded to be able to improve qualified human resources. The 2013 revised 2017 curriculum was an attempt by the government to answer the demands of the industrial revolution 4.0 era which aims to shape the character and competence and literacy of students. However, the reality on the ground showed that student literacy has not been implemented well. One solution to overcome these problems is to develop a cognitive conflict based Physics Worksheet. The purpose of this research was to determine the validity, practicality and effectiveness of the student worksheet Physics based on cognitive conflict. This type of research is Development Research using the Plomp model. The object of the research was cognitive conflict based student worksheet. Data source validation results from experts by the Physics lecturer at the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences UNP, the results of practicality by Physics teachers, as well as the results of the practicality of one to one and small groups and effectiveness by students of class X SMAN 7 Padang. The data analysis technique used were descriptive statistical analysis for product validation and practicality and for the effectiveness of using the percentage technique seen from differences in pretest and posttest. The results of data analysis from the research that has been done as following. First, the cognitive conflict based worksheet has a very strong validity with an average value of 86.35. Second, the use of cognitive conflict-based worksheets has a very strong practicality with an average grade of one to one and small group students respectively at 87.32 and 90.90. Third, the use of cognitive conflict based LKS on straight motion and parabolic motion material is effectively used in the learning process to improve students' new literacy. So, it can be concluded that the worksheet based on cognitive conflict in the material of straight motion and parabolic motion is valid, practical, and effective in increasing the new literacy of class X high school students.","PeriodicalId":176296,"journal":{"name":"PILLAR OF PHYSICS EDUCATION","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PILLAR OF PHYSICS EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24036/7948171074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

The era of the industrial revolution 4.0 which is very influential in human life today, especially in the field of education to create better generations for the nation. Education is demanded to be able to improve qualified human resources. The 2013 revised 2017 curriculum was an attempt by the government to answer the demands of the industrial revolution 4.0 era which aims to shape the character and competence and literacy of students. However, the reality on the ground showed that student literacy has not been implemented well. One solution to overcome these problems is to develop a cognitive conflict based Physics Worksheet. The purpose of this research was to determine the validity, practicality and effectiveness of the student worksheet Physics based on cognitive conflict. This type of research is Development Research using the Plomp model. The object of the research was cognitive conflict based student worksheet. Data source validation results from experts by the Physics lecturer at the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences UNP, the results of practicality by Physics teachers, as well as the results of the practicality of one to one and small groups and effectiveness by students of class X SMAN 7 Padang. The data analysis technique used were descriptive statistical analysis for product validation and practicality and for the effectiveness of using the percentage technique seen from differences in pretest and posttest. The results of data analysis from the research that has been done as following. First, the cognitive conflict based worksheet has a very strong validity with an average value of 86.35. Second, the use of cognitive conflict-based worksheets has a very strong practicality with an average grade of one to one and small group students respectively at 87.32 and 90.90. Third, the use of cognitive conflict based LKS on straight motion and parabolic motion material is effectively used in the learning process to improve students' new literacy. So, it can be concluded that the worksheet based on cognitive conflict in the material of straight motion and parabolic motion is valid, practical, and effective in increasing the new literacy of class X high school students.
分析学生基于直线和抛物线的认知冲突的工作表的有效性和实践
工业革命4.0的时代对当今人类的生活产生了很大的影响,特别是在教育领域,为国家创造了更好的一代。要求教育能够提高合格的人力资源。2013年修订的2017年课程是政府为应对工业革命4.0时代的要求而做出的尝试,旨在塑造学生的性格、能力和读写能力。然而,实际情况表明,学生扫盲并没有得到很好的实施。克服这些问题的一个解决方案是开发一个基于认知冲突的物理工作表。本研究的目的是确定基于认知冲突的学生物理作业表的效度、实用性和有效性。这种类型的研究是使用普洛姆普模型的发展研究。研究对象是基于认知冲突的学生工作表。数据源验证结果来自UNP数学与自然科学学院物理讲师的专家,物理教师的实用性结果,以及X班学生一对一和小组实用性和有效性的结果。使用的数据分析技术是描述性统计分析,用于产品验证和实用性,以及从前测和后测差异中看到的使用百分比技术的有效性。本研究的数据分析结果如下:首先,基于认知冲突的工作表具有很强的效度,平均效度为86.35。其次,基于认知冲突的工作表的使用具有很强的实用性,平均成绩为一对一,小组学生分别为87.32和90.90。第三,在学习过程中有效利用基于认知冲突的直线运动和抛物线运动材料的LKS,提高学生的新素养。因此,基于直线运动和抛物线运动材料中认知冲突的工作表对提高X班高中学生的新素养是有效的、实用的和有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信