Can We Safely Stop Administering Anti-D Immune Globulin to First Trimester Rh-Negative Mothers Undergoing Abortion? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Tolu Lemi Belay, Tufa Tesfaye H, Abubeker Ferid A, Daba Mekdes, Prager Sarah
{"title":"Can We Safely Stop Administering Anti-D Immune Globulin to First Trimester Rh-Negative Mothers Undergoing Abortion? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Tolu Lemi Belay, Tufa Tesfaye H, Abubeker Ferid A, Daba Mekdes, Prager Sarah","doi":"10.36959/468/477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Fetal red blood cells can express the D-antigen as early as 52 days after the last menstrual period. However, there is no convincing evidence for the benefit of using anti-D immune globulin (RhIG) in the first trimester. The aim of the current review is therefore to determine whether administration of RhIG to women undergoing first trimester spontaneous or induced abortions prevents subsequent sensitization. Methods: We searched Medline, Embase.com, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CCRCT) via EBM Reviews (Ovid), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). Two reviewers performed the study selection, critical appraisal, and data extraction independently. Quality of evidence for major outcomes was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE). Results: Four studies met the inclusion criteria with total of 444 participants. The fixed effect meta-analysis showed that there is 0.41 times less antibody formation in women who received RhIG compared to those who did not receive (OR = 0.41, CI, 0.05-3.66, P-value 0.43). Women who took anti-D were also 0.75 times less likely to be sensitized in subsequent pregnancy compared to women who received RhIG (OR = 0.75, CI 0.07-8.42, P-value 0.82). However, none of the studies reported on Increased fetal surveillance or fetal transfusion in subsequent pregnancy, neonatal morbidity, maternal adverse event and cost of treatment. Conclusions: The evidence of RhIG provision following first trimester abortion to prevent antibody formation and sensitization in a subsequent pregnancy is statistically insignificant and very low quality. The practice of administering RhIG after first trimester abortion is based on expert opinion and largely extrapolated from fetomaternal hemorrhage in late pregnancy. However, the evidence indicates that the fetomataernal hemorrhage in the first trimester is not enough to cause sensitization. Therefore, the recommendation to administer RhIG in the first trimester should depend on effectiveness, resource availability, cost, values, preferences, equity, acceptability and feasibility of RhIG provision.","PeriodicalId":206072,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36959/468/477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Fetal red blood cells can express the D-antigen as early as 52 days after the last menstrual period. However, there is no convincing evidence for the benefit of using anti-D immune globulin (RhIG) in the first trimester. The aim of the current review is therefore to determine whether administration of RhIG to women undergoing first trimester spontaneous or induced abortions prevents subsequent sensitization. Methods: We searched Medline, Embase.com, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CCRCT) via EBM Reviews (Ovid), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). Two reviewers performed the study selection, critical appraisal, and data extraction independently. Quality of evidence for major outcomes was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE). Results: Four studies met the inclusion criteria with total of 444 participants. The fixed effect meta-analysis showed that there is 0.41 times less antibody formation in women who received RhIG compared to those who did not receive (OR = 0.41, CI, 0.05-3.66, P-value 0.43). Women who took anti-D were also 0.75 times less likely to be sensitized in subsequent pregnancy compared to women who received RhIG (OR = 0.75, CI 0.07-8.42, P-value 0.82). However, none of the studies reported on Increased fetal surveillance or fetal transfusion in subsequent pregnancy, neonatal morbidity, maternal adverse event and cost of treatment. Conclusions: The evidence of RhIG provision following first trimester abortion to prevent antibody formation and sensitization in a subsequent pregnancy is statistically insignificant and very low quality. The practice of administering RhIG after first trimester abortion is based on expert opinion and largely extrapolated from fetomaternal hemorrhage in late pregnancy. However, the evidence indicates that the fetomataernal hemorrhage in the first trimester is not enough to cause sensitization. Therefore, the recommendation to administer RhIG in the first trimester should depend on effectiveness, resource availability, cost, values, preferences, equity, acceptability and feasibility of RhIG provision.
我们可以安全地停止使用抗d免疫球蛋白对妊娠早期流产rh阴性母亲吗?系统回顾和荟萃分析
胎儿红细胞早在末次月经后52天就能表达d抗原。然而,没有令人信服的证据表明在妊娠早期使用抗d免疫球蛋白(RhIG)有益。因此,本综述的目的是确定给予妊娠早期自然流产或人工流产的妇女RhIG是否能防止随后的致敏。方法:我们通过EBM Reviews (Ovid)、ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov)和WHO国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en)检索Medline、Embase.com、Cochrane中央对照试验注册库(CCRCT)。两位审稿人独立进行研究选择、批判性评价和数据提取。主要结局的证据质量采用推荐、评估、发展和评价分级法(GRADE)进行评估。结果:4项研究符合纳入标准,共纳入444名受试者。固定效应荟萃分析显示,接受RhIG治疗的女性抗体形成比未接受RhIG治疗的女性少0.41倍(OR = 0.41, CI, 0.05-3.66, p值0.43)。与服用RhIG的妇女相比,服用抗- d的妇女在随后的妊娠中致敏的可能性也降低了0.75倍(OR = 0.75, CI 0.07-8.42, p值0.82)。然而,没有一项研究报告了增加胎儿监测或胎儿输血后妊娠,新生儿发病率,产妇不良事件和治疗费用。结论:妊娠早期流产后提供RhIG以防止后续妊娠中抗体形成和致敏的证据在统计学上不显著且质量很低。妊娠早期流产后给予RhIG的做法是基于专家意见,并在很大程度上从妊娠晚期的胎母出血推断出来。然而,有证据表明,前三个月的胎儿出血不足以引起致敏。因此,建议在妊娠早期实施RhIG应取决于有效性、资源可用性、成本、价值、偏好、公平性、可接受性和提供RhIG的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书