A Comparative Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Endotracheal Suctioning with and without Normal Saline Instillation in Terms of Physiological Parameters and Patient Outcome Measures among Mechanically Ventilated Patients in Selected Hospital of New Delhi

S. Johnson
{"title":"A Comparative Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Endotracheal Suctioning with and without Normal Saline Instillation in Terms of Physiological Parameters and Patient Outcome Measures among Mechanically Ventilated Patients in Selected Hospital of New Delhi","authors":"S. Johnson","doi":"10.24321/2455.9318.201814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intubated patients are unable to cough sufficiently to remove pulmonary secretion. Nurses occasionally encounter thick and tenacious secretions during endotracheal (ET) suctioning. To manage these secretions, normal saline instillation (NSI) is used throughout the world. The use of NSI before endotracheal suctioning is intended to lubricate the catheter, liquefy and soften secretions, and stimulate coughing. The objectives of the study were to assess the effectiveness of endotracheal suctioning with normal saline instillation in terms of physiological parameters and patient outcome among mechanically ventilated patients; to assess the effectiveness of endotracheal suctioning without normal saline instillation in terms of physiological parameters and patient outcome among mechanically ventilated patients; and to compare the effectiveness in terms of physiological parameters and patient outcome in mechanically ventilated patients with and without normal saline instillation. Methods: A quantitative research approach with comparative descriptive design was used for the study. The study was conducted in Max Super specialty Hospital, Saket and New Delhi. Purposive sampling was used for selecting 60 mechanically ventilated patients, from which 30 had undergone ET suctioning with normal saline instillation and 30 had undergone ET suctioning without normal saline instillation. Physiological parameters were assessed by using an observation checklist. Patient outcomes were assessed through observations made at 0–72 hours. Results: The significant findings of the study revealed that mechanically ventilated patients, who had undergone ET suctioning with NSI in comparison to patients who had undergone ET suctioning without NSI, were significant in terms of ventilator tidal volume at 18 hours, p value was 0.005 (p1), similarly systolic blood pressure at 6 hours and 12 hours were 0.001 and 0.049 respectively, significant at 0.05 level of significance. p value of temperature at 12 hours was 0.031, p values of ABG PaO2 at 0 hour, 6 hours,12 hours and 18 hours were 0.036, 0.005, 0.022 and 0.043 respectively, significant at 0.05 level of significance, p values of ABG Na+ at 6 hours and 12 hours were 0.003 and 0.001 respectively, significant at 0.05 level of significance, p values of ABG K+ at 6 hours were 0.046, p values of ABG Ca++ at 0 hour and 12 hours were 0.044 and 0.045 which were significant at 0.05 level respectively; however, the p2 value calculated by ANOVA test from 0–72 hours of patient outcome was not significant at 0.05 level of significance. Conclusion: The findings of the present study conclude that normal saline instillation while ET suctioning was effective in comparison to ET suctioning without normal saline instillation among mechanically ventilated patients in terms of respiratory parameters.","PeriodicalId":392369,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing & Midwifery Research","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing & Midwifery Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24321/2455.9318.201814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intubated patients are unable to cough sufficiently to remove pulmonary secretion. Nurses occasionally encounter thick and tenacious secretions during endotracheal (ET) suctioning. To manage these secretions, normal saline instillation (NSI) is used throughout the world. The use of NSI before endotracheal suctioning is intended to lubricate the catheter, liquefy and soften secretions, and stimulate coughing. The objectives of the study were to assess the effectiveness of endotracheal suctioning with normal saline instillation in terms of physiological parameters and patient outcome among mechanically ventilated patients; to assess the effectiveness of endotracheal suctioning without normal saline instillation in terms of physiological parameters and patient outcome among mechanically ventilated patients; and to compare the effectiveness in terms of physiological parameters and patient outcome in mechanically ventilated patients with and without normal saline instillation. Methods: A quantitative research approach with comparative descriptive design was used for the study. The study was conducted in Max Super specialty Hospital, Saket and New Delhi. Purposive sampling was used for selecting 60 mechanically ventilated patients, from which 30 had undergone ET suctioning with normal saline instillation and 30 had undergone ET suctioning without normal saline instillation. Physiological parameters were assessed by using an observation checklist. Patient outcomes were assessed through observations made at 0–72 hours. Results: The significant findings of the study revealed that mechanically ventilated patients, who had undergone ET suctioning with NSI in comparison to patients who had undergone ET suctioning without NSI, were significant in terms of ventilator tidal volume at 18 hours, p value was 0.005 (p1), similarly systolic blood pressure at 6 hours and 12 hours were 0.001 and 0.049 respectively, significant at 0.05 level of significance. p value of temperature at 12 hours was 0.031, p values of ABG PaO2 at 0 hour, 6 hours,12 hours and 18 hours were 0.036, 0.005, 0.022 and 0.043 respectively, significant at 0.05 level of significance, p values of ABG Na+ at 6 hours and 12 hours were 0.003 and 0.001 respectively, significant at 0.05 level of significance, p values of ABG K+ at 6 hours were 0.046, p values of ABG Ca++ at 0 hour and 12 hours were 0.044 and 0.045 which were significant at 0.05 level respectively; however, the p2 value calculated by ANOVA test from 0–72 hours of patient outcome was not significant at 0.05 level of significance. Conclusion: The findings of the present study conclude that normal saline instillation while ET suctioning was effective in comparison to ET suctioning without normal saline instillation among mechanically ventilated patients in terms of respiratory parameters.
新德里某医院机械通气患者经气管吸痰加生理盐水与不加生理盐水的生理参数及预后指标的比较研究
插管患者不能咳出足够的肺分泌物。护士在气管内(ET)吸痰时偶尔会遇到粘稠而顽固的分泌物。为了控制这些分泌物,世界各地都使用生理盐水滴注(NSI)。气管内吸痰前使用NSI是为了润滑导管,液化和软化分泌物,并刺激咳嗽。本研究的目的是评估机械通气患者在生理参数和患者预后方面气管内吸痰加生理盐水滴注的有效性;评价机械通气患者气管内吸痰不滴注生理盐水在生理参数和预后方面的有效性;并比较机械通气患者在生理参数和患者预后方面的有效性。方法:采用比较描述性设计的定量研究方法。这项研究是在萨克特和新德里的马克斯超级专科医院进行的。采用目的抽样的方法,选取60例机械通气患者,其中30例行ET吸入加生理盐水灌注,30例行ET吸入不加生理盐水灌注。采用观察表评估生理参数。通过0-72小时的观察来评估患者的预后。结果:本研究的显著性发现:机械通气患者行体外吸痰合并体外吸痰与行体外吸痰未行体外吸痰患者相比,18小时呼吸机潮气量差异有统计学意义,p值为0.005 (p1), 6小时和12小时收缩压相似,分别为0.001和0.049,差异有统计学意义,在0.05水平上有统计学意义。p值的温度在12个小时是0.031,p值ABG PaO2 0小时、6小时、12小时和18个小时是0.036,0.005,0.022和0.043分别显著于0.05水平的意义,p值ABG Na + 6小时和12小时分别为0.003和0.001,明显在0.05水平的意义,p值的ABG K + 6小时是0.046,p值ABG Ca + + 0小时和12小时分别为0.044和0.045分别在0.05显著水平;然而,从患者结局0-72小时通过ANOVA检验计算的p2值在0.05水平上无统计学意义。结论:本研究结果表明,在机械通气患者中,在吸入ET的同时注入生理盐水比在不注入生理盐水的情况下吸入ET更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信