The German Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) Chairmanship in 2016

Éva Remek
{"title":"The German Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) Chairmanship in 2016","authors":"Éva Remek","doi":"10.32565/aarms.2017.3.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Germany planned its 2016 Chairmanship of the OSCE to establish the following goals “to renew dialogue and to restore trust among participating states and the security of Europe”.[30] Germany supported actual work on the priorities of its Chairmanship, which involved e.g.—inter alia—strengthening OSCE capabilities across the conflict cycle, handling old and new challenges of the fundamental freedoms in the OSCE region, strengthening good governance, and other new types of challenges. The German Chairmanship continued the work of the earlier chairmanships of previous years. There are state “chairs” (Switzerland and Serbia held the OSCE Chairmanships in 2014 and 2015, they are the OSCE Troika) and they started a “new model to address new challenges”. Related to that it should be noted (for this work’s keywords), that Foreign Minister Steinmeier said: “Germany wanted to durably strengthen the OSCE and its tradition of an equal dialogue among all participating States. This was the only way to rebuild lost trust and restore security on the European continent in the long term. This was all the truer against the background of the conflict in Ukraine, in which the OSCE had proved its outstanding importance and indispensability.” [30]This analysis aims to present the work done throughout 2016. This paper shows and demonstrates that during the German chairmanship of the Organization a meaningful dialogue was lead and co-operation was pursued in various fields of common interest (mainly their role in context of the European security and the Ukrainian crisis) throughout the dimensions of the OSCE. The OSCE approaches security along these three dimensions: the politico-military, the economic and environmental, and the human. This study is a part of my research work, so in the current text details also can be read with reference to the earlier and subsequent studies, which have already been or will have been written. This seems inevitable because, as I have pointed out above, my previous and next studies have referred/will refer to OSCE, crisis management and Ukrainian events, too.","PeriodicalId":171955,"journal":{"name":"Academic and Applied Research in Military and Public Management Science","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic and Applied Research in Military and Public Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32565/aarms.2017.3.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Germany planned its 2016 Chairmanship of the OSCE to establish the following goals “to renew dialogue and to restore trust among participating states and the security of Europe”.[30] Germany supported actual work on the priorities of its Chairmanship, which involved e.g.—inter alia—strengthening OSCE capabilities across the conflict cycle, handling old and new challenges of the fundamental freedoms in the OSCE region, strengthening good governance, and other new types of challenges. The German Chairmanship continued the work of the earlier chairmanships of previous years. There are state “chairs” (Switzerland and Serbia held the OSCE Chairmanships in 2014 and 2015, they are the OSCE Troika) and they started a “new model to address new challenges”. Related to that it should be noted (for this work’s keywords), that Foreign Minister Steinmeier said: “Germany wanted to durably strengthen the OSCE and its tradition of an equal dialogue among all participating States. This was the only way to rebuild lost trust and restore security on the European continent in the long term. This was all the truer against the background of the conflict in Ukraine, in which the OSCE had proved its outstanding importance and indispensability.” [30]This analysis aims to present the work done throughout 2016. This paper shows and demonstrates that during the German chairmanship of the Organization a meaningful dialogue was lead and co-operation was pursued in various fields of common interest (mainly their role in context of the European security and the Ukrainian crisis) throughout the dimensions of the OSCE. The OSCE approaches security along these three dimensions: the politico-military, the economic and environmental, and the human. This study is a part of my research work, so in the current text details also can be read with reference to the earlier and subsequent studies, which have already been or will have been written. This seems inevitable because, as I have pointed out above, my previous and next studies have referred/will refer to OSCE, crisis management and Ukrainian events, too.
2016年德国担任欧洲安全与合作组织(欧安组织)主席
德国计划在2016年担任欧安组织主席期间确立以下目标:“恢复参与国之间的对话,恢复信任,维护欧洲安全”。[30]德国支持在其担任主席期间就优先事项开展的实际工作,例如,除其他外,加强欧安组织在整个冲突周期中的能力,处理欧安组织区域内基本自由的新旧挑战,加强善治和其他新型挑战。德国担任主席期间继续了前几年担任主席期间的工作。有国家“主席”(瑞士和塞尔维亚分别在2014年和2015年担任欧安组织主席,他们是欧安组织三驾马车),他们开始了“应对新挑战的新模式”。与此相关的是,应当指出(关于这项工作的关键词),施泰因迈尔外长说:“德国希望持久地加强欧安组织及其所有参加国之间平等对话的传统。从长远来看,这是重建失去的信任和恢复欧洲大陆安全的唯一途径。在乌克兰冲突的背景下,这一点更加真实,欧安组织在乌克兰冲突中证明了其突出的重要性和不可或缺性。[30]本分析旨在介绍整个2016年的工作。本文显示并证明,在德国担任欧安组织主席期间,在欧安组织的各个层面上,在共同关心的各个领域(主要是他们在欧洲安全和乌克兰危机中的作用)进行了有意义的对话和合作。欧安组织从以下三个方面来处理安全问题:政治-军事、经济和环境以及人。这项研究是我的研究工作的一部分,所以在目前的文本细节也可以参考之前和后续的研究,已经或将要写。这似乎是不可避免的,因为正如我上面指出的那样,我以前和今后的研究也涉及/将涉及欧安组织、危机管理和乌克兰事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信