Psychological Components of Pedagogical Communication

N. Mykhalchuk, І. Rudzevych
{"title":"Psychological Components of Pedagogical Communication","authors":"N. Mykhalchuk, І. Rudzevych","doi":"10.32626/2227-6246.2022-57.70-89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the purpose of our research is to determine psychological components of pedagogical communication; to show the most successful ways of organizing discussion at the lessons at institutions of higher education.methods of the research. The following theoretical methods of the re-search were used to solve the tasks formulated in the article: the categorical method, structural and functional methods, the methods of the analysis, sys-tematization, modeling, generalization. The method of organizing empirical re-search was used as an experimental method.the results of the research. It is proved, that for different people the same word, the action, the circumstance might have different meanings. Therefore, the child must not only master the language (words with different meanings), but also the system of accepted personal meanings, focused on relevant moral and spiritual values. It is showed, that, on the other hand, adults needed to un-derstand the personal meanings of the child. Otherwise, interpersonal conflicts can arise in the process of communication, which not only lead to misunder-standing between partners, but also to disruption of feedback and interaction between people in general.conclusions. The teacher is proved to have formed his/her own individual language style, which would correspond to the composition of his/her persona-lity, promote the person’s adequate expression and compensate the teacher’s negative traits. It is showed, that there was a great reason to believe that in order to achieve the greatest expressiveness of speech, to create a casual di-alogic relationships in the discussion, the teacher could use elements of collo-quial speech, heterogeneous vocabulary, stylistic interruptions, etc. In addition, mastering the techniques of creating the individual style of pedagogical speech forms, a teacher’s social maturity, it contributes to a more adequate orientation in various situations that are arisen in the classroom during discussions.","PeriodicalId":250456,"journal":{"name":"Collection of Research Papers \"Problems of Modern Psychology\"","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collection of Research Papers \"Problems of Modern Psychology\"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2022-57.70-89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

the purpose of our research is to determine psychological components of pedagogical communication; to show the most successful ways of organizing discussion at the lessons at institutions of higher education.methods of the research. The following theoretical methods of the re-search were used to solve the tasks formulated in the article: the categorical method, structural and functional methods, the methods of the analysis, sys-tematization, modeling, generalization. The method of organizing empirical re-search was used as an experimental method.the results of the research. It is proved, that for different people the same word, the action, the circumstance might have different meanings. Therefore, the child must not only master the language (words with different meanings), but also the system of accepted personal meanings, focused on relevant moral and spiritual values. It is showed, that, on the other hand, adults needed to un-derstand the personal meanings of the child. Otherwise, interpersonal conflicts can arise in the process of communication, which not only lead to misunder-standing between partners, but also to disruption of feedback and interaction between people in general.conclusions. The teacher is proved to have formed his/her own individual language style, which would correspond to the composition of his/her persona-lity, promote the person’s adequate expression and compensate the teacher’s negative traits. It is showed, that there was a great reason to believe that in order to achieve the greatest expressiveness of speech, to create a casual di-alogic relationships in the discussion, the teacher could use elements of collo-quial speech, heterogeneous vocabulary, stylistic interruptions, etc. In addition, mastering the techniques of creating the individual style of pedagogical speech forms, a teacher’s social maturity, it contributes to a more adequate orientation in various situations that are arisen in the classroom during discussions.
教学交际的心理成分
我们研究的目的是确定教学交际的心理成分;展示在高等教育机构的课堂上组织讨论的最成功的方法。研究方法。本文采用了分类法、结构与功能法、分析方法、系统化方法、建模方法、泛化方法等理论方法来解决本文提出的研究任务。采用组织实证研究的方法作为实验方法。研究的结果。事实证明,对于不同的人来说,同样的词、行为、环境可能有不同的含义。因此,孩子不仅要掌握语言(不同意义的词语),还要掌握公认的个人意义体系,关注相关的道德和精神价值。这表明,另一方面,成年人需要理解孩子的个人意义。否则,在沟通过程中会产生人际冲突,不仅会导致合作伙伴之间的误解,而且会导致人们之间的反馈和互动中断。教师形成了自己独特的语言风格,这种风格与教师人格的构成相对应,促进了教师人格的充分表达,弥补了教师的消极特质。结果表明,为了达到最大的言语表现力,在讨论中创造一种随意的对话关系,教师可以使用同质性言语、异质词汇、文体中断等元素。此外,掌握创造教学语言形式的个人风格的技巧,教师的社会成熟度,有助于在课堂讨论中出现的各种情况下更充分地定位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信