Relationship between the effect of induction chemotherapy and timing of radiotherapy in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer

Weishuai Liu, Lujun Zhao, Yong Guan, Wencheng Zhang, Z. Yuan, Ping Wang
{"title":"Relationship between the effect of induction chemotherapy and timing of radiotherapy in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer","authors":"Weishuai Liu, Lujun Zhao, Yong Guan, Wencheng Zhang, Z. Yuan, Ping Wang","doi":"10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-8179.20131273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aims to analyze the relationship between the effect of induction chemotherapy and the timing of radiotherapy in limited-disease or limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LSCLC). Methods: Data from 148 LSCLC patients who re- ceived induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy between January 2009 and December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The effect of two to three cycles of induction chemotherapy was evaluated according to the RECIST version 1.1, which includes complete re- sponse (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease, and progressive disease. CR and PR were used to calculate response rate. The pa- tients were divided into early and late groups based on immediate radiotherapy after two to three cycles of induction chemotherapy. The survival rate was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test and Cox regression model were used to evaluate the influenc- ing factors of the survival rate. Results: The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 22.8 and 13.0 months, respectively. The early and late radiotherapy groups exhibited OS of 34.0 and 18.0 months, respectively, and corresponding PFS of 16.8 and 10.9 months. In the subgroup analysis, for the patients who responded to the induction chemotherapy, the early and late radiotherapy groups showed median OS of 18.0 and 19.5 months, respectively, and corresponding PFS of 19.4 and 11.7 months. For the patients who had no response to the induction chemotherapy, the early and late radiotherapy groups exhibited median OS of 18.0 and 9.5 months, respectively, and corresponding PFS of 12.4 and 10.3 months. Conclusion: All LSCLC patients who received two to three cycles of induction chemotherapy should receive radiotherapy as soon as possible after chemotherapy, regardless of their response to the induction chemotherapy.","PeriodicalId":314105,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oncology and Cancer Research","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oncology and Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-8179.20131273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to analyze the relationship between the effect of induction chemotherapy and the timing of radiotherapy in limited-disease or limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LSCLC). Methods: Data from 148 LSCLC patients who re- ceived induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy between January 2009 and December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The effect of two to three cycles of induction chemotherapy was evaluated according to the RECIST version 1.1, which includes complete re- sponse (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease, and progressive disease. CR and PR were used to calculate response rate. The pa- tients were divided into early and late groups based on immediate radiotherapy after two to three cycles of induction chemotherapy. The survival rate was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test and Cox regression model were used to evaluate the influenc- ing factors of the survival rate. Results: The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 22.8 and 13.0 months, respectively. The early and late radiotherapy groups exhibited OS of 34.0 and 18.0 months, respectively, and corresponding PFS of 16.8 and 10.9 months. In the subgroup analysis, for the patients who responded to the induction chemotherapy, the early and late radiotherapy groups showed median OS of 18.0 and 19.5 months, respectively, and corresponding PFS of 19.4 and 11.7 months. For the patients who had no response to the induction chemotherapy, the early and late radiotherapy groups exhibited median OS of 18.0 and 9.5 months, respectively, and corresponding PFS of 12.4 and 10.3 months. Conclusion: All LSCLC patients who received two to three cycles of induction chemotherapy should receive radiotherapy as soon as possible after chemotherapy, regardless of their response to the induction chemotherapy.
局限性小细胞肺癌诱导化疗效果与放疗时机的关系
目的:本研究旨在分析有限病期小细胞肺癌(LSCLC)诱导化疗效果与放疗时机的关系。方法:回顾性分析2009年1月至2012年12月期间接受诱导化疗和放疗的148例LSCLC患者的资料。根据RECIST 1.1版评估2 - 3个周期诱导化疗的效果,包括完全缓解(CR)、部分缓解(PR)、病情稳定和病情进展。用CR和PR计算反应率。患者在诱导化疗2 ~ 3个周期后立即放疗,分为早期组和晚期组。采用Kaplan-Meier法分析生存率。采用Log-rank检验和Cox回归模型评价影响生存率的因素。结果:中位总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)分别为22.8和13.0个月。早期和晚期放疗组的OS分别为34.0和18.0个月,相应的PFS为16.8和10.9个月。在亚组分析中,对诱导化疗有反应的患者,早期和晚期放疗组的中位OS分别为18.0和19.5个月,相应的PFS为19.4和11.7个月。对于诱导化疗无反应的患者,早期和晚期放疗组的中位OS分别为18.0和9.5个月,相应的PFS为12.4和10.3个月。结论:所有接受2 ~ 3个周期诱导化疗的LSCLC患者,不论其对诱导化疗的反应如何,化疗后均应尽快接受放疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信