Protocol Stack-Aware Comparison of Centroid Localization Algorithms Based on Anchor Density Using Cooja

İsmail Hakkı Turan, Doğan Yildiz, Sercan Demirci
{"title":"Protocol Stack-Aware Comparison of Centroid Localization Algorithms Based on Anchor Density Using Cooja","authors":"İsmail Hakkı Turan, Doğan Yildiz, Sercan Demirci","doi":"10.1109/SmartNets58706.2023.10216113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Location reconnaissance of sensor nodes is crucial for many outdoor applications. In fact, some outdoor wireless sensor networks are deployed solely for location information. However, adding a GPS module to each node can increase the cost of the wireless sensor network. Therefore, software-based location estimation using radio signals becomes necessary. Hardware without a GPS module requires nodes with known locations in the network. To keep the cost of the network economically reasonable, the density of anchor nodes in the network with expensive nodes that have GPS modules should be investigated. In this study, an alternative method has been developed for transmitting localization packets in Contiki-NG firmware Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs), as point-to-point communication is not suitable for the nature of WSNs. Using the method, the minimum anchor node density and transmission range required for localization in mesh topologies, was investigated according to negligible location estimation errors with Cooja network simulation environment. Three centroid-based algorithms have been compared based on localization error and localization ratio. At the end of the study, the minimum transmission range and anchor density ratio required for localization algorithms were determined. It was shown how effective the MAC policy was up to which transmission range. It was demonstrated how incorrect conclusions could be reached when network protocol stack requirements were not considered.","PeriodicalId":301834,"journal":{"name":"2023 International Conference on Smart Applications, Communications and Networking (SmartNets)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 International Conference on Smart Applications, Communications and Networking (SmartNets)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SmartNets58706.2023.10216113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Location reconnaissance of sensor nodes is crucial for many outdoor applications. In fact, some outdoor wireless sensor networks are deployed solely for location information. However, adding a GPS module to each node can increase the cost of the wireless sensor network. Therefore, software-based location estimation using radio signals becomes necessary. Hardware without a GPS module requires nodes with known locations in the network. To keep the cost of the network economically reasonable, the density of anchor nodes in the network with expensive nodes that have GPS modules should be investigated. In this study, an alternative method has been developed for transmitting localization packets in Contiki-NG firmware Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs), as point-to-point communication is not suitable for the nature of WSNs. Using the method, the minimum anchor node density and transmission range required for localization in mesh topologies, was investigated according to negligible location estimation errors with Cooja network simulation environment. Three centroid-based algorithms have been compared based on localization error and localization ratio. At the end of the study, the minimum transmission range and anchor density ratio required for localization algorithms were determined. It was shown how effective the MAC policy was up to which transmission range. It was demonstrated how incorrect conclusions could be reached when network protocol stack requirements were not considered.
基于Cooja的锚点密度质心定位算法的协议栈感知比较
传感器节点的位置侦察对于许多户外应用至关重要。事实上,一些户外无线传感器网络的部署仅仅是为了获取位置信息。然而,在每个节点上添加GPS模块会增加无线传感器网络的成本。因此,利用无线电信号进行基于软件的位置估计是必要的。没有GPS模块的硬件需要网络中已知位置的节点。为了使网络成本在经济上合理,需要对具有GPS模块的昂贵节点的网络中锚节点的密度进行研究。在本研究中,由于点对点通信不适合无线传感器网络(WSNs)的性质,因此开发了一种替代方法来传输Contiki-NG固件无线传感器网络(WSNs)中的定位数据包。利用该方法,在Cooja网络仿真环境下,根据可忽略的定位估计误差,研究了网格拓扑中定位所需的最小锚节点密度和传输距离。从定位误差和定位率两方面比较了三种基于质心的定位算法。在研究结束时,确定了定位算法所需的最小传输范围和锚密度比。验证了MAC策略在传输范围内的有效性。在不考虑网络协议栈要求的情况下,可能会得出错误的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信