Governance of Public Health in Local Development with Migratory Migrate Flows from the Center of Mexico

Lirios Cg
{"title":"Governance of Public Health in Local Development with Migratory Migrate Flows from the Center of Mexico","authors":"Lirios Cg","doi":"10.23880/nhij-16000262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gross mode, the relationship between migration, health and development has been undertaken through governance, as a result of an identity process that is reduced to the choice of dominant groups such as the dominated and dominated cultures such as migrants. In that sense, the differences between leaders and followers lie in: a) their access to information disseminated by the State in the media; b) its ability to process information, ethics and logic alluding to risk and resilience; c) legitimization of differences based on mistrust of public administration and management. In this way, the objective of this paper is to highlight the limits of the literature consulted with respect to identity, considering as a hegemonic and preponderant factor the explanation of the continuum of: migration, health and endogenous development (local and / or regional). To this end, a non- experimental, exploratory, cross-sectional and correlational study was carried out, with a non-probabilistic selection of 345 workers, including leaders, both migrants and natives from a central Mexican location. The results show that the intentions of occupational health determine the behaviors of the so-called self-care, but these were discussed in light of the findings reported in the literature. There are lines of research with other variables, which explain in detail the sense of community, as well as occupational health and social entrepreneurship.","PeriodicalId":264619,"journal":{"name":"Nursing & Healthcare International Journal","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing & Healthcare International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/nhij-16000262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gross mode, the relationship between migration, health and development has been undertaken through governance, as a result of an identity process that is reduced to the choice of dominant groups such as the dominated and dominated cultures such as migrants. In that sense, the differences between leaders and followers lie in: a) their access to information disseminated by the State in the media; b) its ability to process information, ethics and logic alluding to risk and resilience; c) legitimization of differences based on mistrust of public administration and management. In this way, the objective of this paper is to highlight the limits of the literature consulted with respect to identity, considering as a hegemonic and preponderant factor the explanation of the continuum of: migration, health and endogenous development (local and / or regional). To this end, a non- experimental, exploratory, cross-sectional and correlational study was carried out, with a non-probabilistic selection of 345 workers, including leaders, both migrants and natives from a central Mexican location. The results show that the intentions of occupational health determine the behaviors of the so-called self-care, but these were discussed in light of the findings reported in the literature. There are lines of research with other variables, which explain in detail the sense of community, as well as occupational health and social entrepreneurship.
从墨西哥中部移民流动的地方发展公共卫生治理
总的来说,移徙、健康和发展之间的关系是通过治理来处理的,这是一个身份认同过程的结果,这个过程被简化为选择占主导地位的群体,如占主导地位的群体和占主导地位的文化,如移徙者。从这个意义上说,领导者和追随者之间的区别在于:a)他们获得国家在媒体上传播的信息的机会;B)处理信息、伦理和逻辑的能力,涉及风险和复原力;C)基于对公共行政和管理的不信任而使分歧合法化。通过这种方式,本文的目的是强调参考文献在身份认同方面的局限性,将对移民、健康和内生发展(地方和/或区域)连续体的解释视为霸权和优势因素。为此,进行了一项非实验性、探索性、横断面和相关性研究,非概率选择了来自墨西哥中部地区的345名工人,包括领导,移民和当地人。结果表明,职业健康的意图决定了所谓的自我护理行为,但这些都是根据文献报道的结果来讨论的。还有其他变量的研究,详细解释了社区意识,以及职业健康和社会企业家精神。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信