Review of the legal ownership status of national lands in Cameroon: A more nuanced view

S. Assembe-Mvondo, C. Colfer, M. Brockhaus, R. Tsanga
{"title":"Review of the legal ownership status of national lands in Cameroon: A more nuanced view","authors":"S. Assembe-Mvondo, C. Colfer, M. Brockhaus, R. Tsanga","doi":"10.1080/21665095.2014.927739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper revisits the legal status of land tenure in Cameroon in response to many publications which claim that 97% of land belongs to the State. In fact, the current Cameroonian land-tenure system is based on the distinction between public/State lands; private lands and national lands. Therefore, the review of the legislation in force and the theory of constitutional law show that a more nuanced interpretation of the legal status of land and forests in Cameroon leads to the conclusion that the State does not have sole and absolute ownership over land and forests, as many studies claim. From this viewpoint, distinction should be made between State ownership of public land and State administration of national lands which really belong to the Cameroonian Nation or People. However, the current legal (vague) status granting sole and absolute powers to the State as custodian of national lands no longer meets local communities’ and indigenous people's claims on land inherent in the global REDD+ impetus and land grabbing. Hence, there is need to initiate policy and legal reforms so as to provide for land belonging to local communities and indigenous communities, distinct from the national lands domain.","PeriodicalId":273252,"journal":{"name":"Development Studies Research. An Open Access Journal","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development Studies Research. An Open Access Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2014.927739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

This paper revisits the legal status of land tenure in Cameroon in response to many publications which claim that 97% of land belongs to the State. In fact, the current Cameroonian land-tenure system is based on the distinction between public/State lands; private lands and national lands. Therefore, the review of the legislation in force and the theory of constitutional law show that a more nuanced interpretation of the legal status of land and forests in Cameroon leads to the conclusion that the State does not have sole and absolute ownership over land and forests, as many studies claim. From this viewpoint, distinction should be made between State ownership of public land and State administration of national lands which really belong to the Cameroonian Nation or People. However, the current legal (vague) status granting sole and absolute powers to the State as custodian of national lands no longer meets local communities’ and indigenous people's claims on land inherent in the global REDD+ impetus and land grabbing. Hence, there is need to initiate policy and legal reforms so as to provide for land belonging to local communities and indigenous communities, distinct from the national lands domain.
回顾喀麦隆国家土地的法律所有权状况:一个更微妙的观点
本文回顾了喀麦隆土地所有权的法律地位,以回应许多出版物声称97%的土地属于国家。事实上,喀麦隆目前的土地保有制度是基于公共/国家土地的区分;私人土地和国家土地。因此,对现行立法和宪法理论的审查表明,对喀麦隆土地和森林的法律地位作出更细致的解释会得出结论,即国家并不象许多研究报告所声称的那样对土地和森林拥有唯一和绝对的所有权。从这一观点来看,应当区分公共土地的国家所有权和国家对真正属于喀麦隆民族或人民的国家土地的管理。然而,目前的法律(模糊)地位赋予国家作为国家土地保管人的唯一和绝对权力,不再符合当地社区和土著人民对全球REDD+动力和土地掠夺所固有的土地要求。因此,有必要开始进行政策和法律改革,以便规定属于当地社区和土著社区的土地有别于国家土地领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信