Analysis of Thinking Skills in Report Writing Textbooks: for Writing Education for Foreign College Students

T. Yang
{"title":"Analysis of Thinking Skills in Report Writing Textbooks: for Writing Education for Foreign College Students","authors":"T. Yang","doi":"10.37736/kjlr.2023.04.14.2.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyzed how thinking ability, a core ability required in the 21st century, is promoted in foreign college students’ report writing textbooks. Analysis the questions and instructions of four foreign college student report writing textbooks in this study identified five thinking skills: factual thinking, reasoning thinking, analytical thinking, critical thinking, and creative thinking. In all textbooks, inferential thinking was the most common (32.9%), followed by analytical (25.7%), creative (17.3%), factual (15.7%), and critical(8.4%). There were slight differences in each textbook, but the treatment of thinking ability was found to be similar and similar types of thinking skills were taught. \nIn addition, many studies have criticized textbooks as lacking creativity, but they were not compared to Korean textbooks, and failed to examine logical thinking. Therefore, more careful consideration of critical, analytical, and logical thinking skills as well as creative thinking is needed in these textbooks.","PeriodicalId":372781,"journal":{"name":"Korean Association for Literacy","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Association for Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37736/kjlr.2023.04.14.2.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study analyzed how thinking ability, a core ability required in the 21st century, is promoted in foreign college students’ report writing textbooks. Analysis the questions and instructions of four foreign college student report writing textbooks in this study identified five thinking skills: factual thinking, reasoning thinking, analytical thinking, critical thinking, and creative thinking. In all textbooks, inferential thinking was the most common (32.9%), followed by analytical (25.7%), creative (17.3%), factual (15.7%), and critical(8.4%). There were slight differences in each textbook, but the treatment of thinking ability was found to be similar and similar types of thinking skills were taught. In addition, many studies have criticized textbooks as lacking creativity, but they were not compared to Korean textbooks, and failed to examine logical thinking. Therefore, more careful consideration of critical, analytical, and logical thinking skills as well as creative thinking is needed in these textbooks.
报告写作教材中的思维技巧分析——面向外国大学生写作教育
本研究分析了国外大学生报告写作教材如何提升21世纪所需要的核心能力——思维能力。本研究通过分析四本外国大学生报告写作教材的问题和说明,确定了五种思维技能:事实思维、推理思维、分析思维、批判性思维和创造性思维。在所有教科书中,推理思维最为常见(32.9%),其次是分析思维(25.7%)、创造性思维(17.3%)、事实思维(15.7%)和批判性思维(8.4%)。每本教材略有不同,但思维能力的处理方法是相似的,并且教授了类似类型的思维技能。另外,也有很多研究指出,教科书缺乏创造性,但没有与韩国教科书进行比较,也没有对逻辑思维进行检验。因此,在这些教科书中需要更仔细地考虑批判性、分析性和逻辑思维技能以及创造性思维。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信