IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SUKATENDEL VILLAGE REGULATION POLICY NO. 01 OF 2019 CONCERNING THE DISASTER RESILIENT VILLAGE PROGRAM

Riri Rezeki Hariani, Neri Arisuma, Elga Rahayu
{"title":"IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SUKATENDEL VILLAGE REGULATION POLICY NO. 01 OF 2019 CONCERNING THE DISASTER RESILIENT VILLAGE PROGRAM","authors":"Riri Rezeki Hariani, Neri Arisuma, Elga Rahayu","doi":"10.54443/morfai.v2i3.408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indonesia is an archipelagic country that is vulnerable to natural and non-natural disasters. The trend of natural disasters that occur in Indonesia itself tends to increase from year to year as well as what happened in Karo Regency. According to BPS data from 2015-2020 there was an increase in natural disasters, especially those caused by the eruption of Mount Sinabung.The problem that occurs is that Sukatendel Village is located in Tiganderket District, Karo Regency which has an altitude of 500 meters above sea level. This certainly increases the risk of disaster. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of implementing the Sukatendel Village Regulation No. 01 of 2019 regarding the Disaster Resilient Village program. With qualitative research methods. The results showed thatImplementation of Village Regulation No. 1 of 2018 concerning the disaster-resilient village program which includes 4 (four) factors, namely: The communication factor has not been carried out properly, due to the irregularity of socialization activities and the limitations of information communication tools to the surrounding community. The human resource factor is adequate in the implementation of DESTANA with the establishment of a village management and DRR Forum, but has limited budget and facilities in disaster management. The disposition factor or commitment owned by the implementor is good in carrying out its responsibilities as the implementer of the policy. The bureaucratic structure factor in the implementation of DESTANA has been directed and clear with the creation of a disaster management mechanism, the division and role of each team, but this is of course with the approval of the Karo Regency Government.","PeriodicalId":144739,"journal":{"name":"MORFAI JOURNAL","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MORFAI JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54443/morfai.v2i3.408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Indonesia is an archipelagic country that is vulnerable to natural and non-natural disasters. The trend of natural disasters that occur in Indonesia itself tends to increase from year to year as well as what happened in Karo Regency. According to BPS data from 2015-2020 there was an increase in natural disasters, especially those caused by the eruption of Mount Sinabung.The problem that occurs is that Sukatendel Village is located in Tiganderket District, Karo Regency which has an altitude of 500 meters above sea level. This certainly increases the risk of disaster. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of implementing the Sukatendel Village Regulation No. 01 of 2019 regarding the Disaster Resilient Village program. With qualitative research methods. The results showed thatImplementation of Village Regulation No. 1 of 2018 concerning the disaster-resilient village program which includes 4 (four) factors, namely: The communication factor has not been carried out properly, due to the irregularity of socialization activities and the limitations of information communication tools to the surrounding community. The human resource factor is adequate in the implementation of DESTANA with the establishment of a village management and DRR Forum, but has limited budget and facilities in disaster management. The disposition factor or commitment owned by the implementor is good in carrying out its responsibilities as the implementer of the policy. The bureaucratic structure factor in the implementation of DESTANA has been directed and clear with the creation of a disaster management mechanism, the division and role of each team, but this is of course with the approval of the Karo Regency Government.
实施苏卡藤德尔村整治政策号。2019年1月1日,关于抗灾村计划
印度尼西亚是一个易受自然灾害和非自然灾害影响的群岛国家。在印度尼西亚发生的自然灾害的趋势一年比一年增加,在卡罗摄政发生的情况也是如此。根据BPS 2015-2020年的数据,自然灾害有所增加,特别是锡纳朋火山喷发造成的自然灾害。问题是Sukatendel村位于Karo Regency的Tiganderket区,海拔500米。这无疑增加了发生灾难的风险。本研究的目的是确定关于抗灾村计划的2019年第01号《苏卡滕德尔村条例》的实施效果。采用定性研究方法。结果表明,《2018年第1号村规》关于抗灾村项目的执行情况包含4个因素,即:由于社会化活动的不规范和对周边社区的信息沟通工具的限制,沟通因素没有得到适当的开展。人力资源因素在执行DESTANA方面是充分的,建立了村庄管理和减灾论坛,但在灾害管理方面的预算和设施有限。实施者所拥有的处置因素或承诺有利于其履行作为政策实施者的责任。随着灾害管理机制的建立、每个小组的分工和作用的确定,执行DESTANA的官僚结构因素得到了指导和明确,但这当然是经过卡罗摄政政府的批准的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信