A STUDY OF COMPARISON OF SUBTENON’S ANAESTHESIA WITH PERIBULBAR ANAESTHESIA IN MANUAL SMALL INCISION CATARACT SURGERY IN RIMS TEACHING HOSPITAL RAICHUR

International Journal of Integrative Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2019-07-20 DOI:10.16965/IJIMS.2019.111

H. Kumar, Kavita Patil

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Results: 56% Subtenon’s anaesthesia group patients, and 32% Peribulbar anaesthesia group patients had no pain, when it compared it is statistically significant (0.048), 20% Subtenon’s anaesthesia group patients, and 64% Peribulbar anaesthesia group patients had no grade 0, when it compared it is statistically significant (0.004), and 20% Subtenon’s anaesthesia group patients, and 64% Peribulbar anaesthesia group patients had no grade 0, when it compared it is statistically significant (0.004).

查看原文本刊更多论文

人工小切口白内障手术中腱突麻醉与球周麻醉的比较研究

结果:56%的Subtenon麻醉组患者和32%的球周麻醉组患者无疼痛，与之比较有统计学意义(0.048)，20%的Subtenon麻醉组患者和64%的球周麻醉组患者无0级疼痛，与之比较有统计学意义(0.004)，20%的Subtenon麻醉组患者和64%的球周麻醉组患者无0级疼痛，与之比较有统计学意义(0.004)。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Journal of Integrative Medical Sciences

自引率

0.00%

发文量