A Study of Ramsey's Extremely Poor Reading of Chapter III of J. M. Keynes's A Treatise on Probability and the Refutations Made by J. M. Keynes and Bertrand Russell
{"title":"A Study of Ramsey's Extremely Poor Reading of Chapter III of J. M. Keynes's A Treatise on Probability and the Refutations Made by J. M. Keynes and Bertrand Russell","authors":"M. E. Brady","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2397404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Frank P Ramsey’s critique of Keynes’s logical Theory of Probability, presented in 1925 and published in 1930, is so weak and poor that J M Keynes or Bertrand Russell could easily have refuted and decimated Ramsey’s claims in the space of one half of an hour to one hour at Keynes’s Political Economy club in 1925 or 1926 if they had chosen to do so.This raises the question of whether or not Ramsey ever understood the book he had claimed to be reviewing. There is a very high probability that Ramsey did not read and understand Keynes’s chapter III when he published both his 1922 review in the Cambridge Magazine and the 1926 review in 1930 posthumously.","PeriodicalId":153695,"journal":{"name":"Cognition in Mathematics","volume":"212 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition in Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2397404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Frank P Ramsey’s critique of Keynes’s logical Theory of Probability, presented in 1925 and published in 1930, is so weak and poor that J M Keynes or Bertrand Russell could easily have refuted and decimated Ramsey’s claims in the space of one half of an hour to one hour at Keynes’s Political Economy club in 1925 or 1926 if they had chosen to do so.This raises the question of whether or not Ramsey ever understood the book he had claimed to be reviewing. There is a very high probability that Ramsey did not read and understand Keynes’s chapter III when he published both his 1922 review in the Cambridge Magazine and the 1926 review in 1930 posthumously.
弗兰克•P•拉姆齐(Frank P Ramsey)对凯恩斯(Keynes)的《逻辑概率论》(logical Theory of Probability)的批评于1925年提出,1930年发表。他的批评是如此无力和拙劣,以至于凯恩斯(J . M . Keynes)或伯特兰•罗素(Bertrand Russell)在1925年或1926年的凯恩斯政治经济学俱乐部,如果他们愿意的话,只要半个小时到一个小时的时间,就能轻而易举地驳斥和摧毁拉姆齐的主张。这引发了一个问题:拉姆齐是否真的理解了他声称要评论的那本书。拉姆齐很有可能没有阅读和理解凯恩斯的第三章,当他在1922年的《剑桥杂志》上发表评论时,以及在他死后的1930年发表1926年的评论时。