A Study of Ramsey's Extremely Poor Reading of Chapter III of J. M. Keynes's A Treatise on Probability and the Refutations Made by J. M. Keynes and Bertrand Russell

M. E. Brady
{"title":"A Study of Ramsey's Extremely Poor Reading of Chapter III of J. M. Keynes's A Treatise on Probability and the Refutations Made by J. M. Keynes and Bertrand Russell","authors":"M. E. Brady","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2397404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Frank P Ramsey’s critique of Keynes’s logical Theory of Probability, presented in 1925 and published in 1930, is so weak and poor that J M Keynes or Bertrand Russell could easily have refuted and decimated Ramsey’s claims in the space of one half of an hour to one hour at Keynes’s Political Economy club in 1925 or 1926 if they had chosen to do so.This raises the question of whether or not Ramsey ever understood the book he had claimed to be reviewing. There is a very high probability that Ramsey did not read and understand Keynes’s chapter III when he published both his 1922 review in the Cambridge Magazine and the 1926 review in 1930 posthumously.","PeriodicalId":153695,"journal":{"name":"Cognition in Mathematics","volume":"212 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition in Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2397404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Frank P Ramsey’s critique of Keynes’s logical Theory of Probability, presented in 1925 and published in 1930, is so weak and poor that J M Keynes or Bertrand Russell could easily have refuted and decimated Ramsey’s claims in the space of one half of an hour to one hour at Keynes’s Political Economy club in 1925 or 1926 if they had chosen to do so.This raises the question of whether or not Ramsey ever understood the book he had claimed to be reviewing. There is a very high probability that Ramsey did not read and understand Keynes’s chapter III when he published both his 1922 review in the Cambridge Magazine and the 1926 review in 1930 posthumously.
论拉姆齐对凯恩斯《概率论》第三章的极差解读及凯恩斯、罗素的反驳
弗兰克•P•拉姆齐(Frank P Ramsey)对凯恩斯(Keynes)的《逻辑概率论》(logical Theory of Probability)的批评于1925年提出,1930年发表。他的批评是如此无力和拙劣,以至于凯恩斯(J . M . Keynes)或伯特兰•罗素(Bertrand Russell)在1925年或1926年的凯恩斯政治经济学俱乐部,如果他们愿意的话,只要半个小时到一个小时的时间,就能轻而易举地驳斥和摧毁拉姆齐的主张。这引发了一个问题:拉姆齐是否真的理解了他声称要评论的那本书。拉姆齐很有可能没有阅读和理解凯恩斯的第三章,当他在1922年的《剑桥杂志》上发表评论时,以及在他死后的1930年发表1926年的评论时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信