Perbandingan Kebutuhan Koagulan Al2(So4)3 dan PAC Untuk Pengolahan Air Bersih Di WTP Sungai Ciapus Kampus IPB Dramaga

Pasca Eka Prasetya
{"title":"Perbandingan Kebutuhan Koagulan Al2(So4)3 dan PAC Untuk Pengolahan Air Bersih Di WTP Sungai Ciapus Kampus IPB Dramaga","authors":"Pasca Eka Prasetya","doi":"10.24843/BLJE.2018.V18.I02.P05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Water Treatment Plant (WTP)  IPB process water from Ciapus River by water purifying process before distributed to consumers. The type of coagulant used is Al2(SO4)3 (aluminum sulfate) or alum and Polyaluminium Chloride (PAC). This study aimed to compare the water quality by using coagulant Al2(SO4)3  and PAC in WTP Ciapus River IPB Dramaga and to find out the optimum dosage of coagulant alum and PAC . This study used a test jar method and ISO (SNI) for the analysis of physical and chemical parameters of water. Based on the results of research, PAC was better than alum with the optimum dose of 20 ppm which produces 0.22 NTU of turbidity, 1 mg/l of TSS and 150 mg/l of TDS. While the optimum dose of alum was 20 ppm which generates 0.49 NTU of turbidity, 0 mg/l of TSS and 164 mg/l of TDS. Average costs for the use of coagulant alum and PAC were Rp. 95/m3 and Rp 215/m3, while the average value of the efficient used of coagulant alum and PAC were 91.34% and 83%. The results of both coagulants meets the criteria of water quality standards in accordance with Regulation of the Minister of Health No. 429 of 2010.","PeriodicalId":270221,"journal":{"name":"Bumi Lestari Journal of Environment","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bumi Lestari Journal of Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24843/BLJE.2018.V18.I02.P05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Water Treatment Plant (WTP)  IPB process water from Ciapus River by water purifying process before distributed to consumers. The type of coagulant used is Al2(SO4)3 (aluminum sulfate) or alum and Polyaluminium Chloride (PAC). This study aimed to compare the water quality by using coagulant Al2(SO4)3  and PAC in WTP Ciapus River IPB Dramaga and to find out the optimum dosage of coagulant alum and PAC . This study used a test jar method and ISO (SNI) for the analysis of physical and chemical parameters of water. Based on the results of research, PAC was better than alum with the optimum dose of 20 ppm which produces 0.22 NTU of turbidity, 1 mg/l of TSS and 150 mg/l of TDS. While the optimum dose of alum was 20 ppm which generates 0.49 NTU of turbidity, 0 mg/l of TSS and 164 mg/l of TDS. Average costs for the use of coagulant alum and PAC were Rp. 95/m3 and Rp 215/m3, while the average value of the efficient used of coagulant alum and PAC were 91.34% and 83%. The results of both coagulants meets the criteria of water quality standards in accordance with Regulation of the Minister of Health No. 429 of 2010.
比较聚合剂Al2(So4)3和PAC在Ciapus river IPB Dramaga校园的清洁水处理
水处理厂(WTP) IPB对来自恰普斯河的水进行净水处理,然后再分配给消费者。使用的混凝剂类型是Al2(SO4)3(硫酸铝)或明矾和聚合氯化铝(PAC)。本研究旨在对Ciapus River IPB Dramaga WTP中使用混凝剂Al2(SO4)3和PAC的水质进行比较,找出混凝剂明矾和PAC的最佳投加量。本研究采用试瓶法和ISO (SNI)法对水的理化参数进行了分析。研究结果表明,PAC效果优于明矾,最佳投加量为20 ppm,浊度为0.22 NTU, TSS为1 mg/l, TDS为150 mg/l。明矾的最佳投加量为20 ppm,浊度为0.49 NTU, TSS为0 mg/l, TDS为164 mg/l。混凝剂明矾和PAC的平均使用成本分别为0.95 Rp /m3和215 Rp /m3,混凝剂明矾和PAC的平均有效利用率分别为91.34%和83%。两种混凝剂的检测结果均符合卫生部2010年第429号条例规定的水质标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信