Optimal control and design guidelines for soft jumping robots: Series elastic actuation and parallel elastic actuation in comparison

Riccardo Incaini, L. Sestini, M. Garabini, M. Catalano, G. Grioli, A. Bicchi
{"title":"Optimal control and design guidelines for soft jumping robots: Series elastic actuation and parallel elastic actuation in comparison","authors":"Riccardo Incaini, L. Sestini, M. Garabini, M. Catalano, G. Grioli, A. Bicchi","doi":"10.1109/ICRA.2013.6630914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A properly designed elastic actuation can increase the jumping height that a legged robot can reach. In this paper we compare the two most popular conceptual soft actuator designs, parallel elastic (PEA) and series elastic (SEA), in the task of maximizing the jumping height. Such task is translated into an optimal control problem. For a simplified version of the problem an analytical solution is provided, while a problem with more realistic constraints (e.g. the linear torque-speed motor characteristic is taken into account) is stated as a convex optimization problem and numerically solved. The results show that: (i) given the power of the motor there exists an optimal constant stiffness that maximizes the performance for both the SEA and the PEA; (ii) the optimal stiffness depends on the task terminal time, the inertial parameters of the system and the reduction ratio of the motor; (iii) in the condition considered the SEA behaves better than the PEA.","PeriodicalId":259746,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2013.6630914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

A properly designed elastic actuation can increase the jumping height that a legged robot can reach. In this paper we compare the two most popular conceptual soft actuator designs, parallel elastic (PEA) and series elastic (SEA), in the task of maximizing the jumping height. Such task is translated into an optimal control problem. For a simplified version of the problem an analytical solution is provided, while a problem with more realistic constraints (e.g. the linear torque-speed motor characteristic is taken into account) is stated as a convex optimization problem and numerically solved. The results show that: (i) given the power of the motor there exists an optimal constant stiffness that maximizes the performance for both the SEA and the PEA; (ii) the optimal stiffness depends on the task terminal time, the inertial parameters of the system and the reduction ratio of the motor; (iii) in the condition considered the SEA behaves better than the PEA.
柔性跳跃机器人的最优控制与设计准则:串联弹性驱动与并联弹性驱动的比较
设计合理的弹性驱动可以提高有腿机器人的跳跃高度。本文比较了两种最流行的概念软执行器设计,并联弹性(PEA)和串联弹性(SEA),在最大跳跃高度的任务中。这一任务转化为最优控制问题。对于问题的简化版本,提供了解析解,而具有更现实约束的问题(例如考虑线性转矩-转速电机特性)被描述为凸优化问题并进行了数值求解。结果表明:(1)给定电机的功率,存在一个最优的恒刚度,使SEA和PEA的性能都达到最大;(ii)最优刚度取决于任务终端时间、系统惯性参数和电机减速比;(iii)在被认为是环境影响评估的情况下,环境影响评估的表现优于环境影响评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信