THE POLISH-UKRAINIAN RECONCILIATION ATTEMPTS ON THE 60TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE VOLHYNIAN MASS MURDERS OF 1943

Tetiana Banakh
{"title":"THE POLISH-UKRAINIAN RECONCILIATION ATTEMPTS ON THE 60TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE VOLHYNIAN MASS MURDERS OF 1943","authors":"Tetiana Banakh","doi":"10.24144/2523-4498.1(46).2022.257490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the Polish-Ukrainian public discussions on the Volhynian mass murders from February to July 2003 and the joint 60th-anniversary commemoration of this massacre, which happened July 11 in Pavlivka village, the Volhynian region in Ukraine. The research is written from the perspective of the conception of reconciliation. The main question is the extent to which this reconciliation was successful. The article is based on Polish and Ukrainian media materials, official statements, letters and appeals of different groups and public figures, and five unpublished interviews conducted by the author in January – June 2019. The methodological research frame is a theory of the politics of memory by Jan Kubik and Michael Bernhardt. The approach is helpful for the classification of mnemonic actors, who participated in the debates, and the research of various memories of Volhynian mass murders. The article stresses the importance of this discussion and the joint commemoration of victims. Leading politicians and intellectuals participated in the debate, especially in Ukraine. The scholars from both sides, who toke the position of mnemonic pluralists, played an important role. They tried to rethink the past of their country and the responsibility in the Polish-Ukrainian conflict. However, this rethinking was difficult for them. Appeals to reconciliation had a spiritual dimension. Therefore the church joined it, although quite carefully. The commemorative action in Pavlivka happened mainly because of state resources. It was inaccessible to a significant part of the Ukrainian public. However, even in this situation, the commemorative action in Pavlivka could contribute to overcoming the conflict of memories if both countries were more pluralistic in the following years.","PeriodicalId":390649,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series: History","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series: History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24144/2523-4498.1(46).2022.257490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article deals with the Polish-Ukrainian public discussions on the Volhynian mass murders from February to July 2003 and the joint 60th-anniversary commemoration of this massacre, which happened July 11 in Pavlivka village, the Volhynian region in Ukraine. The research is written from the perspective of the conception of reconciliation. The main question is the extent to which this reconciliation was successful. The article is based on Polish and Ukrainian media materials, official statements, letters and appeals of different groups and public figures, and five unpublished interviews conducted by the author in January – June 2019. The methodological research frame is a theory of the politics of memory by Jan Kubik and Michael Bernhardt. The approach is helpful for the classification of mnemonic actors, who participated in the debates, and the research of various memories of Volhynian mass murders. The article stresses the importance of this discussion and the joint commemoration of victims. Leading politicians and intellectuals participated in the debate, especially in Ukraine. The scholars from both sides, who toke the position of mnemonic pluralists, played an important role. They tried to rethink the past of their country and the responsibility in the Polish-Ukrainian conflict. However, this rethinking was difficult for them. Appeals to reconciliation had a spiritual dimension. Therefore the church joined it, although quite carefully. The commemorative action in Pavlivka happened mainly because of state resources. It was inaccessible to a significant part of the Ukrainian public. However, even in this situation, the commemorative action in Pavlivka could contribute to overcoming the conflict of memories if both countries were more pluralistic in the following years.
波兰和乌克兰试图在1943年volhynian大屠杀60周年之际和解
这篇文章涉及2003年2月至7月期间波兰和乌克兰民众对Volhynian大屠杀的讨论,以及7月11日在乌克兰Volhynian地区Pavlivka村举行的大屠杀60周年联合纪念活动。本研究从和解概念的角度展开。主要问题是这种和解在多大程度上是成功的。本文基于波兰和乌克兰媒体材料、官方声明、不同团体和公众人物的信件和呼吁,以及作者在2019年1月至6月期间进行的五次未发表的采访。方法论研究框架是由Jan Kubik和Michael Bernhardt提出的记忆政治理论。该方法有助于对参与辩论的助记演员进行分类,并有助于研究沃尔海尼大屠杀的各种记忆。文章强调了这一讨论和共同纪念受害者的重要性。主要的政治家和知识分子参与了辩论,尤其是在乌克兰。双方学者站在助记多元主义者的立场上,发挥了重要作用。他们试图重新思考自己国家的过去,以及在波乌冲突中的责任。然而,这种重新思考对他们来说是困难的。对和解的呼吁具有精神层面。因此,教堂也加入了进来,尽管非常小心。帕夫洛夫卡的纪念行动主要是因为国家资源。很大一部分乌克兰公众无法访问它。然而,即使在这种情况下,如果两国在今后几年更加多元化,在帕夫洛夫卡的纪念行动也可能有助于克服记忆的冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信