Pattern recognition for biomedical imaging and image-guided diagnosis

Nikita V. Orlov, John D. Delaney, D. Eckley, L. Shamir, I. Goldberg
{"title":"Pattern recognition for biomedical imaging and image-guided diagnosis","authors":"Nikita V. Orlov, John D. Delaney, D. Eckley, L. Shamir, I. Goldberg","doi":"10.1109/LISSA.2009.4906724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pattern recognition techniques can potentially be used to quantitatively analyze a wide variety of biomedical images. A challenge in applying this methodology is that biomedical imaging uses many imaging modalities and subjects. Pattern recognition relies on numerical image descriptors (features) to describe image content. Thus, the application of pattern recognition to biomedical imaging requires the development of a wide variety of image features. In this study we compared the efficacy of different techniques for constructing large feature spaces. A two-stage method was employed where several types of derived images were used as inputs for a bank of feature extraction algorithms. Image pyramids, subband filters, and image transforms were used in the first-stage. The feature bank consisted of polynomial coefficients, textures, histograms and statistics as previously described [1]. The basis for comparing the performance of these feature sets was the biological imaging benchmark described in [2]. Our results show that a set of image transforms (Fourier, Wavelet, Chebyshev) performed significantly better than a set of image filters (image pyramids, sub-band filters, and spectral decompositions). The transform technique was used to analyze images of H&E-stained tissue biopsies from two cancers: lymphoma (three types of malignancies) and melanoma (benign, primary, and five secondary tumor sites). The overall classification accuracy for these cancer data sets was 97%.","PeriodicalId":285171,"journal":{"name":"2009 IEEE/NIH Life Science Systems and Applications Workshop","volume":"18 21","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 IEEE/NIH Life Science Systems and Applications Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LISSA.2009.4906724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Pattern recognition techniques can potentially be used to quantitatively analyze a wide variety of biomedical images. A challenge in applying this methodology is that biomedical imaging uses many imaging modalities and subjects. Pattern recognition relies on numerical image descriptors (features) to describe image content. Thus, the application of pattern recognition to biomedical imaging requires the development of a wide variety of image features. In this study we compared the efficacy of different techniques for constructing large feature spaces. A two-stage method was employed where several types of derived images were used as inputs for a bank of feature extraction algorithms. Image pyramids, subband filters, and image transforms were used in the first-stage. The feature bank consisted of polynomial coefficients, textures, histograms and statistics as previously described [1]. The basis for comparing the performance of these feature sets was the biological imaging benchmark described in [2]. Our results show that a set of image transforms (Fourier, Wavelet, Chebyshev) performed significantly better than a set of image filters (image pyramids, sub-band filters, and spectral decompositions). The transform technique was used to analyze images of H&E-stained tissue biopsies from two cancers: lymphoma (three types of malignancies) and melanoma (benign, primary, and five secondary tumor sites). The overall classification accuracy for these cancer data sets was 97%.
生物医学成像和图像引导诊断的模式识别
模式识别技术可以潜在地用于定量分析各种各样的生物医学图像。应用这种方法的一个挑战是生物医学成像使用许多成像方式和对象。模式识别依赖于数字图像描述符(特征)来描述图像内容。因此,模式识别在生物医学成像中的应用需要开发各种各样的图像特征。在本研究中,我们比较了构建大型特征空间的不同技术的有效性。采用两阶段方法,其中几种类型的衍生图像被用作一组特征提取算法的输入。在第一阶段使用了图像金字塔、子带滤波器和图像变换。特征库由多项式系数、纹理、直方图和统计量组成,如前所述[1]。比较这些特征集性能的基础是[2]中描述的生物成像基准。我们的研究结果表明,一组图像变换(傅里叶变换、小波变换、切比雪夫变换)的性能明显优于一组图像滤波器(图像金字塔、子带滤波器和光谱分解)。该转换技术用于分析两种癌症的h&e染色组织活检图像:淋巴瘤(三种恶性肿瘤)和黑色素瘤(良性、原发性和五种继发性肿瘤部位)。这些癌症数据集的总体分类准确率为97%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信