Aki kimarad(t), lemarad(t)? – A település sikeressége és a városi cím

A. Település, ÉS Sikeressége, A. V. Cím, Karsai Viola
{"title":"Aki kimarad(t), lemarad(t)? – A település sikeressége és a városi cím","authors":"A. Település, ÉS Sikeressége, A. V. Cím, Karsai Viola","doi":"10.32643/fk.143.4.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are 346 settlements legally classified as towns and cities in Hungary, representing more than 10 percent of the pool, while the rate of urban population exceeds 71 percent, a value which follows a western rather than an eastern pattern. More than a half of the urban settlements have gained their rank since the political transition in 1989. According to both the Act on Municipalities (1990) and the New Municipality Law (2011), the fundamental rights of settlements (municipalities) are equal, regardless of their legal status; none of them are preferred in terms of source allocation. However, historically and during the recent past it has always been and presently it is prestigious to possess or gain the town rank. Therefore, to achieve this desired rank remains an important goal on the developmental horizon of several villages. This attitude has become more and more important during the centralisation of spatial planning and public administration in the years since 2000 and 2010, which forced some settlements to become more proactive in that manner. Some other municipalities have not even dealt with the idea of competing for the town rank; however, their general development level, social composition or built-up environment is unquestionably urban. In the course of the past 15 years, domestic and increasingly EU-based development funds have proven to be the most crucial source of development for Hungarian municipalities. The present study investigates whether there is any correlation between the success in gaining development funds and the legal status of settlements. The total sum, the structural composition, and the per capita value of development funds awarded are analysed in two (legally) different groups of settlements. The main sample is represented by the 182 newest Hungarian towns that gained the town ranking between 1989 and 2013, which was contrasted with the values of villages that are found to be urban based on either different statistical figures or results of previous research.","PeriodicalId":305418,"journal":{"name":"Földrajzi Közlemények","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Földrajzi Közlemények","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32643/fk.143.4.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are 346 settlements legally classified as towns and cities in Hungary, representing more than 10 percent of the pool, while the rate of urban population exceeds 71 percent, a value which follows a western rather than an eastern pattern. More than a half of the urban settlements have gained their rank since the political transition in 1989. According to both the Act on Municipalities (1990) and the New Municipality Law (2011), the fundamental rights of settlements (municipalities) are equal, regardless of their legal status; none of them are preferred in terms of source allocation. However, historically and during the recent past it has always been and presently it is prestigious to possess or gain the town rank. Therefore, to achieve this desired rank remains an important goal on the developmental horizon of several villages. This attitude has become more and more important during the centralisation of spatial planning and public administration in the years since 2000 and 2010, which forced some settlements to become more proactive in that manner. Some other municipalities have not even dealt with the idea of competing for the town rank; however, their general development level, social composition or built-up environment is unquestionably urban. In the course of the past 15 years, domestic and increasingly EU-based development funds have proven to be the most crucial source of development for Hungarian municipalities. The present study investigates whether there is any correlation between the success in gaining development funds and the legal status of settlements. The total sum, the structural composition, and the per capita value of development funds awarded are analysed in two (legally) different groups of settlements. The main sample is represented by the 182 newest Hungarian towns that gained the town ranking between 1989 and 2013, which was contrasted with the values of villages that are found to be urban based on either different statistical figures or results of previous research.
匈牙利有346个合法的城镇和城市,占总人口的10%以上,而城市人口的比例超过71%,这一数值遵循西方而不是东方的模式。自1989年政治过渡以来,半数以上的城市住区的排名都有所提高。根据《市政法》(1990年)和《新市政法》(2011年),无论其法律地位如何,住区(市政)的基本权利都是平等的;在资源分配方面,它们都不是首选。然而,从历史上和最近的过去来看,拥有或获得城镇的地位一直是很有声望的。因此,实现这一理想的排名仍然是几个村庄发展前景中的一个重要目标。自2000年和2010年以来,在空间规划和公共管理的集中化过程中,这种态度变得越来越重要,这迫使一些定居点以这种方式变得更加主动。其他一些城市甚至没有考虑过争夺城镇地位的想法;然而,它们的总体发展水平、社会构成或建筑环境无疑是城市化的。在过去15年的过程中,国内和日益以欧盟为基础的发展基金已证明是匈牙利各市发展的最重要来源。本研究调查在获得发展资金的成功与住区的法律地位之间是否存在任何关联。在两组(法律上)不同的定居点中,分析了授予的发展基金的总额、结构组成和人均价值。主要样本由1989年至2013年间获得城镇排名的182个最新匈牙利城镇代表,这些城镇与根据不同统计数据或先前研究结果发现的城市村庄的价值进行对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信