Analisis Ijtihad Hukum Membayar Zakat Fitrah dengan Uang Menurut Yusuf Al-Qaradawi dan Wahbah Az-Zuhaili

Nail Fadhel Matien
{"title":"Analisis Ijtihad Hukum Membayar Zakat Fitrah dengan Uang Menurut Yusuf Al-Qaradawi dan Wahbah Az-Zuhaili","authors":"Nail Fadhel Matien","doi":"10.14421/al-mazaahib.v9i2.2369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article defines the difference of ijtihad method used by Yusuf Al-Qaradawi and Wahbah Az-Zuhaili in the legal status of the permission of zakat fitrah payment with money. This article is a qualitative research using data sourced from literature. The data obtained are analyzed using a descriptive-comparative approach. This article shows, that according to Wahbah Az-Zuhaili, based on the jumhur opinion, zakat fitrah must be paid in accordance to the existing text. Meanwhile, Yusuf Al-Qaradawi argues that the payment must be flexible by considering aspects of the benefits that will be received by the poor. Methodologically, Wahbah Az-Zuhaili used qiyās as used in the asy-Syafi'i school. Meanwhile, Yusuf Al-Qaradawi, used the method of Intiqā'i and Insyā'i. This method is used to compare the opinions of scholars, then rated by the aspect of al-muqāranah wa al-muwāzanah. One of the reasons for the determination of staple foods, is, that in ancient times, the use of money as a transaction tool was not popular as it is today. The ever-changing currency value will certainly makes Islamic law (zakat al-fiṭr) not adaptive. However, the value of the benefits of money at this time, can be equated with the benefits of foods in ancient times.","PeriodicalId":375931,"journal":{"name":"Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14421/al-mazaahib.v9i2.2369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article defines the difference of ijtihad method used by Yusuf Al-Qaradawi and Wahbah Az-Zuhaili in the legal status of the permission of zakat fitrah payment with money. This article is a qualitative research using data sourced from literature. The data obtained are analyzed using a descriptive-comparative approach. This article shows, that according to Wahbah Az-Zuhaili, based on the jumhur opinion, zakat fitrah must be paid in accordance to the existing text. Meanwhile, Yusuf Al-Qaradawi argues that the payment must be flexible by considering aspects of the benefits that will be received by the poor. Methodologically, Wahbah Az-Zuhaili used qiyās as used in the asy-Syafi'i school. Meanwhile, Yusuf Al-Qaradawi, used the method of Intiqā'i and Insyā'i. This method is used to compare the opinions of scholars, then rated by the aspect of al-muqāranah wa al-muwāzanah. One of the reasons for the determination of staple foods, is, that in ancient times, the use of money as a transaction tool was not popular as it is today. The ever-changing currency value will certainly makes Islamic law (zakat al-fiṭr) not adaptive. However, the value of the benefits of money at this time, can be equated with the benefits of foods in ancient times.
根据优素福·卡拉达维(Yusuf Al-Qaradawi)和瓦巴·阿兹-祖海利(azal - zuhaili)的说法,对撒迦特·菲拉(Zakat Fitrah)的法律进行分析
本文界定了优素福·卡拉达维和瓦赫巴·阿兹-祖海利所使用的伊吉提哈德方法在允许用金钱支付天课费的法律地位上的区别。本文采用文献资料进行定性研究。所获得的数据使用描述-比较方法进行分析。这篇文章表明,根据Wahbah Az-Zuhaili根据jumhur的意见,天课费特拉必须按照现有案文支付。与此同时,优素福·卡拉达维(Yusuf Al-Qaradawi)认为,通过考虑穷人将获得的福利的各个方面,支付必须灵活。在方法上,Wahbah Az-Zuhaili使用了与asy-Syafi'i学校相同的qiyās。与此同时,优素福·卡拉达维(Yusuf Al-Qaradawi)使用了intiqi和insyya 'i的方法。这种方法是用来比较学者的意见,然后通过al-muqāranah wa al-muwāzanah方面进行评分。确定主食的原因之一是,在古代,使用货币作为交易工具并不像今天这样流行。不断变化的货币价值肯定会使伊斯兰教法(zakat al-fiṭr)不适应。然而,此时金钱的价值效益,可以等同于古代食物的价值效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信