{"title":"PHENOMENON OF NEWS IN THE INTERPRETATION OF T. PEUCER, 1690","authors":"Vitaly M. Vinichenko","doi":"10.18522/1995-0640-2022-4-188-200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Written in 1690 in Latin, T. Peucer's dissertation 'De Relationibus Novellis' was little known to the wide academic community beyond its title until 2000, when it was translated into English and published by the group of scholars from the Potchefstroom University, South Africa. A careful reading of Peucer's dissertation demonstrates several interesting features, the most notable of which are the insignificant interest of its author to newspapers and the lack of a clear distinction between history and news.","PeriodicalId":228573,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Southern Federal University. Philology","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Southern Federal University. Philology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18522/1995-0640-2022-4-188-200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Written in 1690 in Latin, T. Peucer's dissertation 'De Relationibus Novellis' was little known to the wide academic community beyond its title until 2000, when it was translated into English and published by the group of scholars from the Potchefstroom University, South Africa. A careful reading of Peucer's dissertation demonstrates several interesting features, the most notable of which are the insignificant interest of its author to newspapers and the lack of a clear distinction between history and news.
T. Peucer的论文《关系小说》(De Relationibus Novellis)写于1690年,用拉丁文写成,直到2000年由南非波特切夫斯特鲁姆大学(Potchefstroom University)的一群学者翻译成英文出版,才被广泛的学术界所知。仔细阅读佩塞尔的论文会发现几个有趣的特点,其中最引人注目的是作者对报纸的兴趣微不足道,以及历史和新闻之间缺乏明确的区分。