Assessing public perception of self-driving cars: the autonomous vehicle acceptance model

Charles P. Hewitt, I. Politis, Theocharis Amanatidis, Advait Sarkar
{"title":"Assessing public perception of self-driving cars: the autonomous vehicle acceptance model","authors":"Charles P. Hewitt, I. Politis, Theocharis Amanatidis, Advait Sarkar","doi":"10.1145/3301275.3302268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We introduce the Autonomous Vehicle Acceptance Model (AVAM), a model of user acceptance for autonomous vehicles, adapted from existing models of user acceptance for generic technologies. A 26-item questionnaire is developed in accordance with the model and a survey conducted to evaluate 6 autonomy scenarios. In a pilot survey (n = 54) and follow-up survey (n = 187), the AVAM presented good internal consistency and replicated patterns from previous surveys. Results showed that users were less accepting of high autonomy levels and displayed significantly lower intention to use highly autonomous vehicles. We also assess expected driving engagement of hands, feet and eyes which are shown to be lower for full autonomy compared with all other autonomy levels. This highlighted that partial autonomy, regardless of level, is perceived to require uniformly higher driver engagement than full autonomy. These results can inform experts regarding public perception of autonomy across SAE levels. The AVAM and associated questionnaire enable standardised evaluation of AVs across studies, allowing for meaningful assessment of changes in perception over time and between different technologies.","PeriodicalId":153096,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"87","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3301275.3302268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 87

Abstract

We introduce the Autonomous Vehicle Acceptance Model (AVAM), a model of user acceptance for autonomous vehicles, adapted from existing models of user acceptance for generic technologies. A 26-item questionnaire is developed in accordance with the model and a survey conducted to evaluate 6 autonomy scenarios. In a pilot survey (n = 54) and follow-up survey (n = 187), the AVAM presented good internal consistency and replicated patterns from previous surveys. Results showed that users were less accepting of high autonomy levels and displayed significantly lower intention to use highly autonomous vehicles. We also assess expected driving engagement of hands, feet and eyes which are shown to be lower for full autonomy compared with all other autonomy levels. This highlighted that partial autonomy, regardless of level, is perceived to require uniformly higher driver engagement than full autonomy. These results can inform experts regarding public perception of autonomy across SAE levels. The AVAM and associated questionnaire enable standardised evaluation of AVs across studies, allowing for meaningful assessment of changes in perception over time and between different technologies.
评估公众对自动驾驶汽车的看法:自动驾驶汽车接受模型
我们介绍了自动驾驶汽车接受模型(AVAM),这是一个自动驾驶汽车的用户接受模型,改编自现有的用户接受通用技术的模型。根据该模型编制了一份包含26个项目的问卷,并进行了一项调查,以评估6种自治情景。在一项试点调查(n = 54)和一项后续调查(n = 187)中,AVAM显示出良好的内部一致性和与先前调查相同的模式。结果显示,用户对高度自动驾驶汽车的接受程度较低,使用高度自动驾驶汽车的意愿也明显较低。我们还评估了手、脚和眼睛的预期驾驶参与,与所有其他自动驾驶水平相比,完全自动驾驶的预期驾驶参与程度较低。这强调了部分自动驾驶,无论级别如何,都被认为比完全自动驾驶需要更高的驾驶员参与度。这些结果可以让专家了解不同SAE级别的公众对自动驾驶的看法。AVAM和相关问卷能够对研究中的AVs进行标准化评估,允许对不同技术之间随时间的感知变化进行有意义的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信