Nuevo concepto y herramienta para evaluar objetivamente el realismo en simulación clínica

G. Coro-Montanet, Óscar Oliva-Fernández, J. Sánchez-Ituarte, M. J. Pardo-Monedero
{"title":"Nuevo concepto y herramienta para evaluar objetivamente el realismo en simulación clínica","authors":"G. Coro-Montanet, Óscar Oliva-Fernández, J. Sánchez-Ituarte, M. J. Pardo-Monedero","doi":"10.35366/110987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: fidelity has been used, historically, to classify the type of simulation being performed, but it relies on a subjective and fuzzy concept. Objectives: this article proposes a categorized and subcategorized system to evaluate realism qualitatively and quantitatively through a more precise classification and a tool that evaluates the scenic realism indexes achieved in clinical simulation. It also aims to make known the elements of new science that support the new concept and to promote culture and consensus of what is measured, specifying how and by whom it should be evaluated for a better didactic design and analysis of the effects -favorable or not-of the realism achieved. Material and methods: a three-year mixed study (Delphi method and validation by means of Cronbach’s Alpha, Guttman’s Lambda 6 and correlations) and factor analysis was carried out to develop a","PeriodicalId":179877,"journal":{"name":"Revista Latinoamericana de Simulación Clínica","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Latinoamericana de Simulación Clínica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35366/110987","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: fidelity has been used, historically, to classify the type of simulation being performed, but it relies on a subjective and fuzzy concept. Objectives: this article proposes a categorized and subcategorized system to evaluate realism qualitatively and quantitatively through a more precise classification and a tool that evaluates the scenic realism indexes achieved in clinical simulation. It also aims to make known the elements of new science that support the new concept and to promote culture and consensus of what is measured, specifying how and by whom it should be evaluated for a better didactic design and analysis of the effects -favorable or not-of the realism achieved. Material and methods: a three-year mixed study (Delphi method and validation by means of Cronbach’s Alpha, Guttman’s Lambda 6 and correlations) and factor analysis was carried out to develop a
客观评估临床模拟现实主义的新概念和工具
简介:历史上,保真度一直被用来对正在执行的模拟类型进行分类,但它依赖于一个主观和模糊的概念。目的:通过更精确的分类和评估临床模拟中所达到的景物真实感指标的工具,提出了一个分类和亚分类系统,以定性和定量地评估真实感。它还旨在使人们了解支持新概念的新科学元素,并促进对测量内容的文化和共识,规定如何以及由谁来评估它,以便更好地教学设计和分析所实现的现实主义的效果(有利或不有利)。材料和方法:进行了为期三年的混合研究(德尔菲法和通过Cronbach’s Alpha、Guttman’s Lambda 6和相关性进行验证)和因子分析,以制定一个
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信