{"title":"讀王念孫《讀書雜志•晏子春秋》記","authors":"鵬飛 郭, 挺 蔡","doi":"10.24112/sinohumanitas.352628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. \n高郵王念孫(1744—1832)是清代樸學的代表人物,其於經學、子學、小學方面的成就,世罕其匹,《讀書雜志》、《廣雅疏證》等均爲登峰造極之作,後世學者,莫不奉爲圭臬。王氏地位崇高,就其學術而加探討,實饒具意義。今就《讀書雜志·晏子春秋》部分,檢視其中勝義,並就可議之處,略陳己見,以供斟酌。 \nWang Niansun (1744-1832) was a distinguished Qing (1644-1912) scholar with tremendous achievements in the study of the Chinese classics and philology. His work, Yanzi chunqiu zazhi (Miscellaneous Notes on the Yanzi Spring and Autumn Annals), has remained an essential reference for Chinese philologists and historians. While Yanzi chunqiu zazhi is comprehensive and meticulous in its analyses, a number of inaccuracies have also been found. The present essay is intended to be a penetrating study of the successes and failures of Wang’s work.","PeriodicalId":108589,"journal":{"name":"人文中國學報","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"人文中國學報","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24112/sinohumanitas.352628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English.
高郵王念孫(1744—1832)是清代樸學的代表人物,其於經學、子學、小學方面的成就,世罕其匹,《讀書雜志》、《廣雅疏證》等均爲登峰造極之作,後世學者,莫不奉爲圭臬。王氏地位崇高,就其學術而加探討,實饒具意義。今就《讀書雜志·晏子春秋》部分,檢視其中勝義,並就可議之處,略陳己見,以供斟酌。
Wang Niansun (1744-1832) was a distinguished Qing (1644-1912) scholar with tremendous achievements in the study of the Chinese classics and philology. His work, Yanzi chunqiu zazhi (Miscellaneous Notes on the Yanzi Spring and Autumn Annals), has remained an essential reference for Chinese philologists and historians. While Yanzi chunqiu zazhi is comprehensive and meticulous in its analyses, a number of inaccuracies have also been found. The present essay is intended to be a penetrating study of the successes and failures of Wang’s work.
LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English. 高邮王念孙(1744—1832)是清代朴学的代表人物,其于经学、子学、小学方面的成就,世罕其匹,《读书杂志》、《广雅疏证》等均为登峰造极之作,后世学者,莫不奉为圭臬。王氏地位崇高,就其学术而加探讨,实饶具意义。今就《读书杂志·晏子春秋》部分,检视其中胜义,并就可议之处,略陈己见,以供斟酌。 Wang Niansun (1744-1832) was a distinguished Qing (1644-1912) scholar with tremendous achievements in the study of the Chinese classics and philology. His work, Yanzi chunqiu zazhi (Miscellaneous Notes on the Yanzi Spring and Autumn Annals), has remained an essential reference for Chinese philologists and historians. While Yanzi chunqiu zazhi is comprehensive and meticulous in its analyses, a number of inaccuracies have also been found. The present essay is intended to be a penetrating study of the successes and failures of Wang’s work.