Students’ Perception on E-Proctoring System for Online Assessment

A. D. Santis, C. Bellini, Katia Sannicandro, T. Minerva
{"title":"Students’ Perception on E-Proctoring System for Online Assessment","authors":"A. D. Santis, C. Bellini, Katia Sannicandro, T. Minerva","doi":"10.38069/EDENCONF-2020-RW-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Online exams organization increased during the Covid-2019 pandemic. E-proctoring tools represented one of the systems used to take tests and monitor students’ behaviour and integrity. Previous studies on the theme analysed the ease, technical issues and reliability of the system, students’ academic results and digital skills in using online tools, effect of proctored testing on anxiety and performances. The paper presents the results of the questionnaire administered to 541 students at University of Modena and Reggio Emilia to define how the use of e-proctoring systems for exams affects students’ perceptions about their performances and teachers’ role and impacts on concentration, attention, time management, anxiety, understanding, and motivation. The sample was predominantly divided into two equivalent groups in the answers: students who found positive elements in the experience, and students who saw the anxiety worsening using Smowl; students who were ready to use this tool with or without teachers also in the future, and students who found worrying the distance from the teacher. The exception to these results is students in Digital Education course degree who demonstrate greater confidence in proctored testing. The inquiry underlines teachers’ necessity to accurately design the exams and communicate with students in all teaching moments (include assessment).","PeriodicalId":315718,"journal":{"name":"EDEN Conference Proceedings","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDEN Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38069/EDENCONF-2020-RW-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Online exams organization increased during the Covid-2019 pandemic. E-proctoring tools represented one of the systems used to take tests and monitor students’ behaviour and integrity. Previous studies on the theme analysed the ease, technical issues and reliability of the system, students’ academic results and digital skills in using online tools, effect of proctored testing on anxiety and performances. The paper presents the results of the questionnaire administered to 541 students at University of Modena and Reggio Emilia to define how the use of e-proctoring systems for exams affects students’ perceptions about their performances and teachers’ role and impacts on concentration, attention, time management, anxiety, understanding, and motivation. The sample was predominantly divided into two equivalent groups in the answers: students who found positive elements in the experience, and students who saw the anxiety worsening using Smowl; students who were ready to use this tool with or without teachers also in the future, and students who found worrying the distance from the teacher. The exception to these results is students in Digital Education course degree who demonstrate greater confidence in proctored testing. The inquiry underlines teachers’ necessity to accurately design the exams and communicate with students in all teaching moments (include assessment).
学生对网上考试电子监考系统的认知
在2019冠状病毒大流行期间,在线考试组织有所增加。电子监考工具是用来考试和监控学生行为和诚信的系统之一。此前关于该主题的研究分析了该系统的易用性、技术问题和可靠性、学生的学习成绩和使用在线工具的数字技能、监考对焦虑和表现的影响。本文介绍了对摩德纳大学和雷焦艾米利亚大学的541名学生进行问卷调查的结果,以确定电子监考系统的使用如何影响学生对自己的表现和教师角色的看法,以及对注意力、注意力、时间管理、焦虑、理解和动机的影响。在回答中,样本主要分为两组:一组学生发现了经历中的积极因素,另一组学生使用Smowl看到焦虑加剧;准备在未来有老师或没有老师的情况下使用该工具的学生,以及担心与老师距离的学生。这些结果的例外是数字教育课程学位的学生,他们对监考考试表现出更大的信心。这项调查强调了教师在所有教学时刻(包括评估)准确设计考试和与学生沟通的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信