Teachers’ Understanding and Students’ Level of Satisfaction in the Implementation of Differentiated Instruction

Agnes Calabazaron-Ocampo
{"title":"Teachers’ Understanding and Students’ Level of Satisfaction in the Implementation of Differentiated Instruction","authors":"Agnes Calabazaron-Ocampo","doi":"10.56648/aide-irj.v2i1.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Diverse English classrooms and meeting students’ needs require research on differentiated instruction. This study measured teachers’ understanding and students’ satisfaction with implementing differentiated instruction using validated survey questionnaires. This descriptive-correlational study selected student respondents using stratified sampling and teacher respondents using total enumeration. The data was interpreted using frequency count, mean, percent, Chi-square, percentage distribution, Spearman rank correlation, and Pearson r. Results revealed that teachers highly understood differentiated instruction, but students were merely satisfied with the implementation. Differentiated content instruction reflects teachers’ content knowledge and is most appreciated by students. Teachers’ and students’ responses show students’ interests as the least understood and satisfied. In addition, no significant relationships existed between teachers’ understanding of differentiated instruction across all domains (student interest, assessment, lesson planning, content, process, and product) and their profile variables (age, sex, and highest educational attainment). Still, there were positive relationships between teachers’ grade level taught and the number of years of teaching experience. Also, there were no significant relationships between students’ satisfaction with teachers’ use of differentiated instruction in all domains and their profile variables (sex and program), but there were strong positive relationships with students’ age, current grade level, and previous English grades. It was concluded that student and teacher responses showed discrepancies, so a proposed enhancement activity was developed to improve differentiated instruction among English language teachers.","PeriodicalId":385918,"journal":{"name":"AIDE Interdisciplinary Research Journal","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIDE Interdisciplinary Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56648/aide-irj.v2i1.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diverse English classrooms and meeting students’ needs require research on differentiated instruction. This study measured teachers’ understanding and students’ satisfaction with implementing differentiated instruction using validated survey questionnaires. This descriptive-correlational study selected student respondents using stratified sampling and teacher respondents using total enumeration. The data was interpreted using frequency count, mean, percent, Chi-square, percentage distribution, Spearman rank correlation, and Pearson r. Results revealed that teachers highly understood differentiated instruction, but students were merely satisfied with the implementation. Differentiated content instruction reflects teachers’ content knowledge and is most appreciated by students. Teachers’ and students’ responses show students’ interests as the least understood and satisfied. In addition, no significant relationships existed between teachers’ understanding of differentiated instruction across all domains (student interest, assessment, lesson planning, content, process, and product) and their profile variables (age, sex, and highest educational attainment). Still, there were positive relationships between teachers’ grade level taught and the number of years of teaching experience. Also, there were no significant relationships between students’ satisfaction with teachers’ use of differentiated instruction in all domains and their profile variables (sex and program), but there were strong positive relationships with students’ age, current grade level, and previous English grades. It was concluded that student and teacher responses showed discrepancies, so a proposed enhancement activity was developed to improve differentiated instruction among English language teachers.
实施差别化教学中教师的理解与学生的满意度
多样化的英语课堂,满足学生的需求,需要对差别化教学进行研究。本研究采用经验证的调查问卷,测量教师对实施差异化教学的理解程度和学生的满意度。本描述性相关研究采用分层抽样方法选择学生受访者,采用总枚举方法选择教师受访者。使用频率计数、平均值、百分比、卡方、百分比分布、Spearman秩相关和Pearson r来解释数据。结果显示,教师高度理解差异化教学,但学生仅对实施感到满意。差异化内容教学体现了教师的内容知识,是学生最欣赏的。教师和学生的反应表明,学生的兴趣是最不被理解和满足的。此外,教师对所有领域(学生兴趣、评估、课程计划、内容、过程和产品)的差异化教学的理解与他们的个人资料变量(年龄、性别和最高受教育程度)之间不存在显著关系。然而,教师的教学年级水平与教学经验年数之间存在正相关关系。此外,学生对教师在所有领域使用差异化教学的满意度与其个人资料变量(性别和课程)之间没有显著的关系,但与学生的年龄、当前年级水平和以前的英语成绩有很强的正相关。结论是学生和教师的反应存在差异,因此提出了一项增强活动来改善英语教师之间的差异化教学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信