Analysis of cervicovaginal smears in terms of their technical quality

A. Borsuk, A. Pryczynicz, K. Ustymowicz, D. Jagodzińska, K. Guzińska-ustyMowiCz
{"title":"Analysis of cervicovaginal smears in terms of their technical quality","authors":"A. Borsuk, A. Pryczynicz, K. Ustymowicz, D. Jagodzińska, K. Guzińska-ustyMowiCz","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0016.1742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The aim of this study was to analyze the technical evaluation of cervicovaginal smears as well as the correlation of the technical quality of the smear with the patient’s age. \nMaterials and methods: The study included a group of 43,696 women who underwent exfoliative cytology. The smears were stained according to the Papanicolaou method and then underwent cytological evaluation based on the Bethesda system.\nResults: The technical quality of the cytology smears was found to be satisfactory (AI) in 80.6% of cases, acceptable for cytological evaluation (AII) in 19% mainly as a result of poor readability of the smear due to numerous inflammatory cells (35.5%), whereas not suitable for evaluation (AIII) was in 0.4% of cases. Moreover, there was a high proportion of smears without cells from the cervical canal in women under 50 years of age. In women over 50, the most common cause of conditional evaluation of the smear was its excessive dryness\nConclusions: In all age groups, an abundance of inflammatory cells was a factor that hindered cytologic evaluation of the smear. Only representative material containing cells from the cervical canal should be collected. It is of utmost importance to pay special attention to the correct and quick fixation of smears taken from women over 50 years of age.\n\n","PeriodicalId":138155,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Health Sciences","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.1742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to analyze the technical evaluation of cervicovaginal smears as well as the correlation of the technical quality of the smear with the patient’s age. Materials and methods: The study included a group of 43,696 women who underwent exfoliative cytology. The smears were stained according to the Papanicolaou method and then underwent cytological evaluation based on the Bethesda system. Results: The technical quality of the cytology smears was found to be satisfactory (AI) in 80.6% of cases, acceptable for cytological evaluation (AII) in 19% mainly as a result of poor readability of the smear due to numerous inflammatory cells (35.5%), whereas not suitable for evaluation (AIII) was in 0.4% of cases. Moreover, there was a high proportion of smears without cells from the cervical canal in women under 50 years of age. In women over 50, the most common cause of conditional evaluation of the smear was its excessive dryness Conclusions: In all age groups, an abundance of inflammatory cells was a factor that hindered cytologic evaluation of the smear. Only representative material containing cells from the cervical canal should be collected. It is of utmost importance to pay special attention to the correct and quick fixation of smears taken from women over 50 years of age.
宫颈阴道涂片的技术质量分析
前言:本研究的目的是分析宫颈阴道涂片的技术评价,以及涂片技术质量与患者年龄的相关性。材料和方法:该研究包括43,696名接受剥脱细胞学检查的妇女。涂片采用Papanicolaou法染色,Bethesda系统进行细胞学评价。结果:80.6%的病例细胞学涂片技术质量满意(AI), 19%的病例细胞学评价可接受(AII),主要原因是涂片因大量炎症细胞而可读性差(35.5%),而不适合评价(AIII)的病例占0.4%。此外,在50岁以下的妇女中,没有宫颈管细胞的涂片比例很高。在50岁以上的女性中,涂片条件评估的最常见原因是其过度干燥。结论:在所有年龄组中,炎症细胞丰富是阻碍涂片细胞学评估的一个因素。只应收集宫颈管中含有细胞的代表性物质。最重要的是要特别注意正确和快速地固定50岁以上妇女的涂片。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信